9
$\begingroup$

This is in the spirit of the What is a Word/Phrase™ series started by JLee with a special brand of Phrase™ and Word™ puzzles.

If a word conforms to a special rule, I call it a Lovely Word™.

Use the following examples below to find the rule.

enter image description here

And, if you want to analyze, here is a CSV version:

Lovely Words™,Not Lovely Words™
ARTFUL,CLUMSY
CLARINET,VIOLIN
CZARDOMS,KINGDOMS
FEMINISM,MISOGYNY
IMMUNITY,VULNERABLE
LIAR,HONEST
LITERALISM,UNEDUCATED
MIMICS,REAL
MISLODGE,REMOVE
MUNCHKIN,DONUTS
NUGGET,CHICKENS
RACISM,RACIST
SCARCITY,ABUNDANT
SWIVET,SWIVEL
TYRANNIC,EVIL
VICINITY,SURROUNDINGS
YEARNS,DESIRE
ZINC,GOLD

Addition 1:

A. I've found a second answer to the problem, one that I do not want. I will put some counter-examples here.

The following words are Not Lovely Words™: AW, BOWL, CARS, QUEENS.

B. In the chart, MUNCHKIN is listed as a Lovely Word™. This is disputable.

Addition 2:

In the chart, MISLODGE is listed as a Lovely Word™. Whether or not this is disputable is disputable.

Hint 1:

All Lovely Words™ will have an even number of letters. All listed counter examples also have an even number of letters to give you more to work with.

Hint 2:

Try the following:
- Can you find the abnormality in one of the Lovely Words™?
- Can you find the two letters with mutual everlasting love?

The rule isn't complex, although it's not exactly as simple as a doornail. You could determine whether or not a word is a Lovely Word™ by staring at it for perhaps ten seconds.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The fact that Lovely Words are ordered alphabetically is relevant? $\endgroup$ – Yandrakus Sep 26 '16 at 7:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nope. That's just for style. $\endgroup$ – greenturtle3141 Sep 26 '16 at 12:18
  • $\begingroup$ Is it too early to give hints? $\endgroup$ – greenturtle3141 Sep 26 '16 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ I think yes, it's too early to give hints. $\endgroup$ – Yandrakus Sep 27 '16 at 9:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ One thing I've noticed, which is unlikely to be a coincidence: all of the words have an even number of letters. $\endgroup$ – paolo Sep 29 '16 at 12:27
4
$\begingroup$

[EDITED to replace a wrong answer -- thanks, greenturtle3141 -- with what I hope is now a right one.]

I think a word is Lovely (tm) when

it is made up of a succession of compatible pairs of letters, where two letters are compatible if, when written as capitals, they are homeomorphic (i.e., topologically equivalent).

This depends a bit on

the typeface used; in particular, G may either be homeomorphic to a single line or have a bifurcation. Clearly here the latter is the case because it occurs in a pair with E.

This criterion is almost equivalent to

counting the number of "ends", but note that B and O both have no ends but fail to be homeomorphic (they have different numbers of loops; a topologist would observe that their fundamental groups or first homology groups differ). Similarly for A/R (which have loops) versus, say, C (which doesn't).

Lots of things are disputable because of

serifs. E.g., does I have two or 4 ends?

The abnormality mentioned in the second hint is

in the word MISLODGE, where the G is actually in a different typeface or something of the kind -- compare it with the ones in NUGGET. (That should have been a hell of a giveaway and I'm annoyed I didn't notice it until writing this.)

Perhaps the letters with "mutual everlasting love" referred to in the second hint are

P and Q, the only two letters with just one end, which can therefore only ever occur with one another.

Or they might be

D and O, which are the only two homeomorphic to circles. These, unlike P and Q, can actually occur next to one another in a word.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And here I was thinking the everlasting pair was A and R because they are only paired with each other in the lovely words. As a note I did a word search for P and Q together and I don't think there are any words where they are together. $\endgroup$ – gtwebb Oct 5 '16 at 23:17
  • $\begingroup$ Truly one of the all-time great tragic loves. Can't bear to be apart, but never able to be together. $\endgroup$ – Gareth McCaughan Oct 5 '16 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ But "O" has no ends $\endgroup$ – Bohemian Oct 5 '16 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ @Bohemian "B" and "D" also have no ends. $\endgroup$ – gtwebb Oct 5 '16 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ This is extremely close and I upvote. In Addition 1, I put counterexamples such as BOWL to refute this specific solution that I was scared of. It's not exactly the number of ends, but something similar and slightly mathematical. $\endgroup$ – greenturtle3141 Oct 5 '16 at 23:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.