Wrap-up: the making of
Truth in numbers
This is not a solution to the puzzle but provides notes from its poser.
This type of answer has been
approved by the community.
Caution: This post contains information about the solution.
Often a new puzzle makes me glad that someone else thought of it
because I could never have done so.
A new puzzle can also make me wonder
why I hadn’t already thought of it.
Working out this puzzle was
like solving a favorite made by someone else
and wishing that I had thought of it.
This began as a casual idea for a quickie
but its actual complexity came to light
through a series of complete surprises.
The original idea was to combine two
self-referential paradoxical larks.
The first inspiration was
Puzzle: digit x appears y times
on this piece of paper.
There are ten questions on a piece of paper.
Your task is to fill in each blank
with a positive integer less than 10 such that there is no contradiction.
You can reuse any digit.
•   Digit 0 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 1 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 2 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 3 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 4 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 5 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 6 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 7 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 8 appears ____ times on this paper.
•   Digit 9 appears ____ times on this paper.
The second inspiration was an
answer
to
Riddles/puzzles having answer hidden
in the question?.
At least two of these statements are false.
Ignoring grammar and wordplay, which?
a. Pigs is pigs.
b. One plus one is two.
c. Two plus two does not equal five.
d. Five and ten make fifteen.
List of false statements:
1. “At least two of these statements are false.”
So it seemed the new puzzle would be answered without much fuss.
 One Zero
of the numbers here could be changed
so that every statement is true.
•   One plus one equals two.
•   Two plus two equals four.
•   Five plus ten equals fifteen.
(Click inside hidden areas to permanently reveal them.)
Expected surprise.
More answers are likely to be true, such as:
 One Two
of the numbers here could be changed
so that every statement is true.
Which could lead to:
•   One plus
 one two equals
 two  three.
•   Two plus two equals four.
•   Five plus ten equals fifteen.
This unruly multiplicity of possible solutions
could be reduced by limiting changes to a single new value,
allowing only solutions such as:
 One Three
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•    One Zero plus
 one zero equals
 two  zero.
•   Two plus two equals four.
•   Five plus ten equals fifteen.
Surprise surprise.
The changed first statement makes a new claim,
which leads to a third claim,
ultimately daisy chaining to a fourth round:
Three
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•   Zero plus
zero equals
zero.
•   Zero plus
zero equals
zero.
•    One Zero plus
 one zero equals
 two  zero.
Blindside broadside.
The changed first statement is no longer true!
This fourth stage does not contain three numbers that could be changed.
Thus each revision,
leading all the way back to the first change,
actually contained a false statement!
Aww, just one possible answer after all?
Happy surprise ending.
Turns out that a valid revised-claim chain
can begin with a different number.
 One Four
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•   One plus one equals two.
•   Two plus two equals four.
•   Five plus ten equals fifteen.
All statements are indeed true because they can produce:
 One
Four  Zero
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•    One Zero plus
 one zero equals
 two  zero.
•   Two plus two equals four.
•   Five plus ten equals fifteen.
This is ever more interesting than the initial solution
as well as its original extensions.
Sure enough,
in the spirit of lateral-thinking,
an unforeseen
answer
leads to a wonderfully infinite variation, among others.
 1  2
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•   1 + 1 = 2.
•   2 + 2 = 4.
•   5 + 10 = 15.
Can lead to:
2
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•   1 + 1 = 2.
•   2 + 2 = 4.
•   5 +  1  2 0
=  1  2 5.
Which can remain true by alternating endlessly with:
2
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•   1 + 1 = 2.
•   2 + 2 = 4.
•   5 + 2  1 0
= 2  1 5.
Matter of fact, when all values are represented digitally,
every number of changes up to 12(!) can be claimed to work.
 1 
 12  00
of the numbers here could be changed
to a specific value
so that every statement is true.
•    1  0
+  1  0
=  2  0.
•    2  0
+  2  0
= 4  0.
•    5  0
+  1  0 0
=  15  00.
What a blast to get to naively solve subtly complex abstract puzzles
that were never actually thought up by anyone.
Some puzzles are created but this one was discovered.