4
$\begingroup$

Find all functions $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ s.t. for all $x,y\in\mathbb{R}$, we have $$yf(x)+f(y)\ge f(xy)$$


Problem from the my math olympiad training problem set few weeks before.


Functional equations (and inequalities) are mostly on topic.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ While I agree this is on-topic, you would receive better answers if you had posted it in MSE rather than PSE. $\endgroup$
    – Anonymous
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 5:05

3 Answers 3

6
$\begingroup$

I will be building upon Bubbler's progress.

Specifically, Bubbler's answer shows

$f(1)=0$, and $f(x)+f(-x)=C$ for all non-zero $x$.

Let us use $a$ for $f(0)$. Note that

Plugging $x=0$ in the actual inequality gives $$f(y)\ge a-ay.$$ If we further assume $y$ is non-zero, then replacing $y$ with $-y$ gives $$f(-y)\ge a+ay.$$

But we know that

$f(-y)=C-f(y)$ ($y$ was non-zero), so this rewrites as $$f(y)\le C-a-ay.$$

Thus we have the bounds

$a-ax\le f(x)\le C-a-ax$ for all nonzero $x$.

Next, if we

replace $x\to -x$ in the original inequality and add it to the original equality, we get $$y((f(x)+f(-x))+2f(y)\ge f(xy)+f(-xy).$$With the added assumption $x,y$ are non-zero, this gives $$yC+2f(y)\ge C\implies f(y)\ge \frac C2-\frac C2y.$$But teher's already an upper bound on $f(y)$, namely $C-a-ay$, so these bounds must be compatible. In other words, $$C-a-ay\ge \frac C2-\frac C2y.$$This rearranges into $\left(\tfrac C2-a\right)(y+1)\ge 0$. But this has to hold for all non-zero $y$, even though $y+1$ can have any sign! Thus $C/2-a$ has to be zero.; i.e., $C=2a$.

Now our upper and lower bounds for $f(x)$

reduce to the same thing! In other words, we have $f(x)=a-ax$ for $x\ne 0$. This is true for $x=0$ too, because $a=f(0)$ by definition. Thus this is the only possible form; the fact that this indeed works is simple to check.

$\endgroup$
8
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Nice solution! (Perhaps mines is more complex than this) Checkmark incoming! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ The original proof had a small hole (while bounding $yf(x)$, I implicitly assumed $y$ is positive). I think it's fixed now. $\endgroup$
    – Ankoganit
    Commented Feb 8, 2021 at 6:09
  • $\begingroup$ Do you think my method with Vector space can be saved? $\endgroup$
    – nonuser
    Commented Feb 8, 2021 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ @Greedoid I think the vector space argument can be skipped altogether. If f is a solution, then so is g(x)=f(x)-f(0)+f(0)x, and g satisfies g(0)=0. Then the rest of your very neat reasoning applies. $\endgroup$
    – Ankoganit
    Commented Feb 9, 2021 at 3:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah, true, I missed that completely. Shame, I was really hoping your approach is salvageable. $\endgroup$
    – Ankoganit
    Commented Feb 9, 2021 at 16:53
3
$\begingroup$

Here are the properties of $f(x)$ I identified so far. I doubt it's enough to get any credit on a math olympiad, but anyway...

  1. The value of $f(1)$:

$$\begin{align}&x=y=1 & \Rightarrow \quad& f(1)+f(1) \ge f(1), & f(1) \ge 0 \\ &x=y=-1 & \Rightarrow \quad& -f(-1) + f(-1) \ge f(1), & f(1) \le 0 \end{align}$$

$$\therefore f(1) = 0$$

  1. A relationship between $f(x)$ and $f(-x)$, and some knowledge about $f(0)$

$$yf(x) + f(y) \ge f(xy) \\ -yf(x) + f(-y) \ge f(-xy) \\ \therefore f(y)+f(-y) \ge f(xy) + f(-xy)$$ $$xyf\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + f(xy) \ge f(y) \\ -xyf\left(\frac{1}{x}\right) + f(-xy) \ge f(-y) \\ \therefore f(xy)+f(-xy) \ge f(y) + f(-y), \text{ given } x\ne 0$$

Therefore the two sides are equal. Since any two sums in the form of $f(x)+f(-x)$ ($x$ nonzero) are equal by above, we can say that it equals some constant $C$. $$\exists C \in \mathbb{R}, \; \forall x \ne 0, \; f(x)+f(-x)=C$$

Since $f(1) = 0$, $f(-1) = C$ holds, and we can simplify the above to $$ \forall x \ne 0, \; f(x)+f(-x)=f(-1)$$

The first inequality still holds for $x=0$, so $$ f(0) \le \frac{C}{2}$$ (we can't say they are equal because $f$ is not necessarily continuous.)

$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think the quantifiers in the statement about $C$ are the wrong way round. $\endgroup$
    – Ankoganit
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 12:49
  • $\begingroup$ @Ankoganit Thanks, fixed. $\endgroup$
    – Bubbler
    Commented Feb 7, 2021 at 23:44
  • $\begingroup$ This might get you 1 or 2 points, since it is important. $\endgroup$
    – justhalf
    Commented Feb 9, 2021 at 8:25
2
$\begingroup$

Specific values:

  • Putting $x=1$ gives $yf(1)\geq0$ for all $y\in\mathbb{R}$, so we must have $f(1)=0$.

  • Putting $x=0$ gives $f(y)\geq (1-y)f(0)$ for all $y\in\mathbb{R}$, so $f$ is bounded below on any finite subset of $\mathbb{R}$.

Properties of the function $f$:

$yf(x)+f(y)\geq f(xy)$ implies that $f(xy)-f(y)\leq yf(x)$ for all $x,y$.

For any $y>0$, this means $\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\leq f(x)$, so $$\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\leq\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(x)}{1-x},\quad\quad\lim_{x\to1^-}\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\geq\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(x)}{1-x}.$$
For any $y<0$, we have $\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\geq f(x)$, so $$\lim_{x\to1^-}\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\leq\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(x)}{1-x},\quad\quad\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(xy)-f(y)}{y}\geq\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(x)}{1-x}.$$
So, if $f$ is differentiable, then $f'(y)=\lim_{x\to1^+}\frac{f(x)}{1-x}$ is constant for all $y$, so $f$ is linear. Say $f(x)=ax+b$, so we know $a+b=0$ and the original inequality becomes $y(ax-a)+(ay-a)\geq (axy-a)$, which is always true as the LHS and RHS are identical.

So the general differentiable solution is

$f(x)=ax-a$, $a\in\mathbb{R}$.

But must $f$ be differentiable according to the given condition? This part I haven't quite figured out yet.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I frankly doubt it's legal to talk about the limits. $f$ is simply given as a real function, with no guarantees about being continuous or having certain limits. $\endgroup$
    – Bubbler
    Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 6:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Bubbler My use of the notation $\lim_{x\to1}$ implicitly assumes that the limit exists. It's like "we don't know if this limit exists, but if it does, it satisfies this inequality ..." Then the assumption that $f$ is differentiable justifies all that. $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 5, 2021 at 6:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.