A question was put before Iron Man and Miss Tress. They were allowed to choose from the set $\mathbb{C}$ of complex numbers and asked to find a subset satisfying the conditions below:

  • sum is zero
  • product is one

Can you provide two suitably different solutions for Iron Man and Miss Tress?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This question is unclear. What are Iron Man's and Miss Tress's respective aims, over & above making the sum $0$ and product $1$ as stated? (Presumably those aims are different, for different solutions for them to be required.) $\endgroup$ – Rosie F Jun 14 '16 at 9:03
  • $\begingroup$ Good point. Their aim is to make sum 0 and product 1 as stated but hopefully also to choose quite different answers which have some relevance to their names - the title is a hint. $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ You accepted an answer that does not answer the puzzle part? $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 14 '16 at 13:56
  • $\begingroup$ @Jonathan Allan - you have a point. I have unaccepted for now. $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 14:05
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The accepted answer certainly satisfies the mathematical conditions. But I think the wordplay part of the puzzle needs more work: its wording as it stands, IMO, doesn't motivate clearly enough the wordplay that turned out to be involved. $\endgroup$ – Rosie F Jun 16 '16 at 14:29

My guess is that the answer you are after is from first principles
Iron Man

$\{0+i, 0-i\}$
Iron Man $\rightarrow$ IM $\rightarrow \Bbb{Im}$

...or any extension thereof, such as $\{0+ai,0-ai,0+\frac{i}a,0-\frac{i}a\}\forall a \in A \subseteq \Bbb{R}$

Miss Tress

Miss Tress $\rightarrow$ MT $\rightarrow$ "em tee" $\rightarrow$ empty

  • $\begingroup$ This resolves the clues and title hint of the puzzle as hoped for - the initials and then Imaginary and Empty . Miss Tress's inspiration was from the empty product in e.g. mathoverflow.net/questions/45951/sexy-vacuity/45997#45997 $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 15:03
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, or simply that $1$ is the identity element of the group under the operation of multiplication. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 14 '16 at 15:06

i thought about those solutions:

{-i,i} where i+(-i) = 0 and i*(-i) = 1

But any solution as:

{-i/k, i/k, -k,-1,1,k} k>0

would do.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks @Sechiro for this very general and correct solution to make sum 0 and product 1 and you have provided (an infinite number of) different solutions. I'm sorry I added the wordplay tag after your answer. The wordplay is tiny but it helps to distinguish Iron Man's and Miss Tress' answers which I hope will be different in nature. $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 10:02
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ho, ok. then I think { 26 ,- 26, 1/26 , - 1/26 } is a better answer for Iron Man $\endgroup$ – Sechiro Jun 14 '16 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ This has certainly addressed the different solutions part! I think the wordplay tag which wasn't initially included is needed now. $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ I just got your Iron atomic number 26 solution - though it wasn't what I thought it does work. Still holding on to my initial thoughts including the title and Miss Tress $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 11:16
  • $\begingroup$ Your very first solution was the one intended for Iron Man - also thanks for your further very good ones. $\endgroup$ – Tom Jun 14 '16 at 13:44

The empty set is the most obvious solution. There's also an easy-to-find two-element solution: the sum requirement means that one of the numbers is the negative of the other, and the product requirement thus means that the square of that number is $-1$, i.e. the numbers are $i$ and $-i$. I don't know who is going to choose what. “Iron Man” sounds like a jock name so I guess that Miss Tress will be first to pick the easy solution and Iron Man will be left scrambling because he doesn't know what a complex number is.

What if we wanted more solutions? Let's characterize them all.

Let $A$ be any finite subset of $\mathbb{C}$ not containing $0$, $S$ their sum and $P$ their product. $A \cup \{x,y\}$ is a solution iff $x+y+S=0$ and $x\,y\,P=1$, i.e. iff $y=-S-x$ and $P\,x^2 + PSx + 1 = 0$. We know that $P \ne 0$ so this quadratic equation has two distinct solutions if $(PS)^2-4P \ne 0$ i.e. $PS^2 \ne 4$. The sum of the solutions is $-S$, so solutions to the original puzzle are obtained by taking the two roots $x$ and $y$. If neither $x$ nor $y$ is in the original set $A$ then $A \cup \{x,y\}$ is a solution to the puzzle.

Conversely, any solution to the puzzle with a set of at least two elements can be broken down as above (let $A$ be any subset containing all but two elements; $0$ can't be in $A$ since it would cause the product to be $0$).

In particular, for $A = \varnothing$, we get the single two-element solution: $x+y=0$ and $x\,y=1$, i.e. $-x^2=1$ i.e. $\{x,y\}=\{i,-i\}$.

Finally, there is no one-element solution (the number would have to be both equal to $0$ and $1$).

Even with the generalized solution, an association between names and solutions doesn't stand out. You can draw all kinds of pictures with the cloud of points $A$.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Sorry for a stupid question. Why is the sum of the elements of the empty set 0 and the product 1? How can the product be well-defined? $\endgroup$ – Floris Jun 14 '16 at 20:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Floris That's the general definition of the $n$-ary generalization of a binary operation with a neutral element: when you apply it to $0$ items, the result is the neutral element. $\endgroup$ – Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' Jun 14 '16 at 20:53

For Iron Man:

$\zeta^k, k\in\{0,\dots,n-1\}$ and $\zeta=e^{i2\pi/n}$, where $i^2=-1$ and $n$ odd. This gives:
$\dfrac{\zeta^n-1}{\zeta-1}=\sum_\limits{k=0}^{n-1} \zeta^k=0$ because $\zeta^n=1$ and $\prod_\limits{k=0}^{n-1} \zeta^k=1$, provable using the property of $e$ that $e^a\cdot e^b=e^{a+b}$.

For Miss Tress:

The rectangle over $\mathbb{C}$ given by $\pm a \pm ib$ such that $a^2+b^2=1$, because $(a+ib)(a-ib)=a^2+b^2$, and $(-a+ib)(-a-ib)=a^2+b^2$ and $a,b\in\mathbb{R}$

  • $\begingroup$ I am missing the obvious - his defensive energy shield that can be extended up to 360 degrees? $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 14 '16 at 11:19
  • $\begingroup$ OK, I have no idea of the reasoning you've used. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 14 '16 at 11:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.