3
$\begingroup$

This is a real-life puzzle encountered by one of my friends, again.

After landing and arriving at the airport, I want to pick my baggage up quickly. The problem is that the baggage claim is $500$ m away. Luckily, along the way there are many travelators. Let's say, the total length of travelators is $250$ m (hence, the total length of non-travelators is also $250$ m). The travelator speed is $1$ m/s. I can also walk in $1$ m/s but I need to reserve $10\%$ of my walking time to take a rest.

How long and where should I take the rest to quickly arrive at the baggage claim? Should I rest at the travelator or not at the travelator?

Note: Assume you are going to walk for $700$ s, you need to take a rest for $70$ s and can only truly walk for $630$ s. Let's say there is no travelator in the statement, then you need a total of $\frac{5000}{9}=555.55...$ s ($55.55...$ s for rest and $500$ s for walking) to arrive at the baggage claim.

Bonus: Can you generalize the solution for $N$ m away, $K$ m part of travelators, $V_T$ m/s of travelator speed, $V_m$ m/s of my speed, and $P \%$ of rest?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ for the example of purely walking without travelators, ain't the resting time be 500/9 =55.56s ? $\endgroup$
    – Kryesec
    Commented Feb 7, 2019 at 5:18

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

You should

rest at the travelator.

The intuition behind this decision:

You want to rest at the travelator to maximize the time that you are on a travelator. This decreases the effective distance that you have to walk.

Calculation

For the initial problem, suppose you rest $k$ seconds on the travelator, giving you $9k$ meters of walking distance. You gain an additional $k$ meters standing on the travelator, plus $9k-250$ meters of "walking distance on the travelator". So $19k-250=500$ or $k = \frac{750}{19}$, which means it will take you $\frac{7500}{19} \approx 394.7$ seconds. (Compare that with $375+37.5=412.5$ seconds if you walked the entire way and stopped at the end.)

Generalization calculation

It works similarly. If you rest $k$ seconds on the travelator, you get $\frac{100-P}{P}k$ seconds of walking, which covers $V_m\frac{100-P}{P}k$ meters of walking. Now the caveats: you gain an additional $\max(kV_T, K-kV_m)$ meters standing on the travelator, and $\min(\frac{V_T}{V_m}(V_m\frac{100-P}{P}k-(N-K)),0)$ meters walking on the travelator. So you can solve for that :P

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Let's say you're resting for $x$ seconds while not on a travelator and $y$ seconds on one. You have to spend $250$ seconds to walk on the floor and $(250-y)/2$ to walk on the travelator.

$9x+9y = (250-y)/2+y$
$18x+17y = 250$

To keep $x+y+250+(250-y)/2$ at a minimum, we have to minimize $x+y/2 -> 2x+y$. Since $18x+17y = 250 = (2x+y)*9+8y$, maximizing $y$ by resting only on a travelator is the best option.

Generalization:

Let's say you're resting for $x$ seconds while not on a travelator and $y$ seconds on one. You have to spend $(N-K)/V_m$ seconds to walk on the floor and $(K-y*V_T)/(V_m+V_T)$ to walk on the travelator.

$100x+100y = P*[x+y+(N-K)/V_m+(K-y*V_T)/(V_m+V_T)]$
$(100/p-1)(x+y) = (N-K)/V_m+(K-y*V_T)/(V_m+V_T)$

To minimize the right-hand side, we have to minimize $(K-y*V_T)/(V_m+V_T)$ by maximizing $y$ by means of resting only on a travelator.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.