17
$\begingroup$

We take all of the positive integers that are greater than 100 and color them black or white. Prove that no matter what the coloring is, we can always find two distinct numbers a and b so that a, b, and a+b are all the same color.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ You don't get to choose the colouring so that is also a very wrong answer. The point is that you should not need to, but why? @humn $\endgroup$
    – Nij
    Feb 19, 2023 at 2:59
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Did you mean to say "Prove that whatever coloring is chosen, we can always find two distinct numbers a and b so that a, b, and a+b are all the same color."? Because the problem as written is trivial. $\endgroup$ Feb 21, 2023 at 7:38
  • $\begingroup$ @A.I.Breveleri, yes. And the way it is written, it actually isn't trivial. $\endgroup$
    – NielIGuess
    Feb 22, 2023 at 23:12

3 Answers 3

21
$\begingroup$

First I'll ignore the requirement that the numbers are greater than 100, and show that the positive integers cannot be coloured black/white without creating a monochrome additive triplet.

Without loss of generality, we can assume the number 1 is white.
The numbers (5,10,15) cannot all be black, so at least one of them is white. Let k be one such white number.
Clearly k-1 and k+1 must be black to avoid white triplets (1,k-1,k) and (1,k,k+1).
Number 2 must be white to avoid black triplet (2,k-1,k+1).
Number k+2 must be black to avoid white triplet (2,k,k+2).
Number 3 must be black to avoid white triplet (1,2,3).
We now have black triplet (3,k-1,k+2).
Note that 3 and k-1 are distinct because k is at least 5.

To accommodate the requirement that the numbers are greater than 100

the same argument can be used but with everything multiplied by 101.

$\endgroup$
22
$\begingroup$

We'll prove the assertion that there are distinct a,b,a+b of the same colour.

Obvious Fact: If there is a threshold above which all numbers are the same colour the assertion is true.

So let's instead make the

Assumption: There are arbitrarily large numbers of either colour.

Using the assumption find k<l<m of colour x such that l>2k and m>2l. Then if any of the (distinct) numbers l-k,m-l,m-k is colour x we are done. Otherwise they are all colour y and we are done, also.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Proof by contradiction: assume there are no such pairs.

We can easily see that there must be infinitely many numbers of both colors, e.g. if there were only finitely many black numbers then any two numbers greater than the largest black number would both be white, as well as their sum.

Let a, b, c be three distinct numbers of the same color. Without loss of generality, let them be black. We'll add/subtract pairs of numbers of the same color to get new numbers that must be the opposite color to satisfy our assumption.

a + b : white
b + c : white
(a + b) + (b + c) = a + 2b + c : black
(a + 2b + c) - c = a + 2b : white
(a + 2b + c) - a = 2b + c : white
(a + 2b) + (2b + c) = a + 4b + c : black
(a + 4b + c) - (a + 2b + c) = 2b : white

Since there's nothing special about b (we can always find two other numbers of the same color as any given number) this means that for any number x, 2x must be the opposite color. So 4b must also be black.

4b - b = 3b : white
But now we have a contradiction: b and 4b are both black, while 2b and 3b are both white. So b + 4b = 2b + 3b = 5b must be both black and white, which is impossible.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.