-4
$\begingroup$

Bob is trying to crack a puzzle. He finds this numerical sequence:

9056, 528, 64

What should he input after 64?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ why the downvotes? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:04
  • $\begingroup$ have I done something wrong?? :'( $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:07
  • $\begingroup$ Here's a hint.... one gone.....twice... $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You may want to take a look at this. In short, there are really too many ways to get these numbers, so the puzzle is too open-ended. $\endgroup$
    – bobble
    Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:57
  • $\begingroup$ I dont mean this in any disrespect, but I feel that this kind of puzzle is alright, when you can give hints in comment form when one does not get the answer correct. However, I thank you for your correction and will keep this in mind for future puzzles. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 23:08

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Original Answer:

My guess: 22
Going backwards starting from 64:
528 = 64 * 2 + 400
9056 = 528 * 2 + 8000
Notice that 400 = 20^2 and 8000 = 20^3
Therefore, it looks like the pattern would be n * 2 + 20 = 64, so n = 22

Edit:
Going in the other direction as suggested in the comment, we notice that:
9056 / 2 = 4528
528 / 2 = 264
So the pattern could also be dividing by 2 and removing the leading digit.
Using this approach we get

64 / 2 = 32 for a final answer of 2

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ not quite, try right to left. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:02
  • $\begingroup$ AMAZING!!! Great job Kevin! $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:49
2
$\begingroup$

7664

via polynomial interpolation

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ not quite, try simpler ways of solution. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 6, 2020 at 22:04

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.