Timeline for Illegal patterns for the Rubik's cube
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 27, 2018 at 9:34 | vote | accept | Cristi Stoica | ||
Jun 7, 2018 at 5:03 | answer | added | Jaap Scherphuis | timeline score: 7 | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 9:43 | history | edited | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edit 2
|
Jun 6, 2018 at 9:07 | history | edited | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edit 2
|
Jun 6, 2018 at 8:56 | history | edited | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edit 2
|
Jun 6, 2018 at 8:52 | comment | added | Cristi Stoica | @JaapScherphuis good point, that's why I avoided to define "nice", and advised to not let get in your way. | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 8:02 | comment | added | Jaap Scherphuis | There are patterns with a lot of symmetry that are not particularly nice (e.g. superflip). There are also rather nice patterns where all the faces look the same but which don't have much symmetry overall. Because of this I would judge the niceness of a pattern also by the number of colours on each face (the fewer the better), and the number of different face patterns (again the fewer the better). | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 8:00 | comment | added | athin | This is when you asked scientists the definition of "nice". Damn :). | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 7:51 | history | edited | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added mathematical definition of "nice"!
|
Jun 6, 2018 at 7:42 | comment | added | Cristi Stoica | @Sid: OK, I added the mathematical definition of "nice" :) | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 7:42 | history | edited | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added mathematical definition of "nice"!
|
Jun 6, 2018 at 6:13 | comment | added | Sid | Can you be more objective about your question? What do you mean by "Nice"? | |
Jun 6, 2018 at 6:07 | review | First posts | |||
Jun 6, 2018 at 6:25 | |||||
Jun 6, 2018 at 6:04 | history | asked | Cristi Stoica | CC BY-SA 4.0 |