Skip to main content
2 of 3
edited body
GentlePurpleRain
  • 26.5k
  • 6
  • 95
  • 159

If i understand the problem corectly, it seems your reasoning is that you cant go "up" in your diagram, nor can you start at the second row.

if you start with all the fives of the second row, or start with the middle 5 of row two, go up then down, that is two additional ways for each extremity of the second row, if you find other ways for the middle 5 of row 2, you might end up with blue numbers being 5-6-5, which then double for each row, and eventually en up at 256 when summed

Neil
  • 627
  • 4
  • 9