2
$\begingroup$

The following pattern was given to me by one of my friends:
If $$\quad 5 \star 5 = 10$$ $$\quad 6 \star 6=18$$ $$\quad 7 \star 7=36$$
then $$\quad 7 \star 8 = ?$$ a) $54 \quad$ b) $51 \quad$ c) $30$

My Thoughts:
$$5 \times 5 = 25 \to 2\times 5 =10$$ similarly, $$6 \times 6 = 36 \to 3\times 6 =18$$ similarly, $$7 \times 7 = 49 \to 4\times 9 =36$$

$$\implies 7 \times 8 = 56 \to 5\times 6 =30 \implies \text{option } \mathbf{(c)}$$

But my friend has told its answer as $\mathbf{a)\,54}$;
so, can anyone explain the relevant logic ...

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ There is insufficient information provided to yield a unique solution in this case. $\endgroup$ Apr 13, 2019 at 6:17
  • $\begingroup$ @TheSimpliFire Are you getting option b as its answer? $\endgroup$
    – Suresh
    Apr 13, 2019 at 6:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No, as 51 is odd. But a) and c) are equally reasonable. $\endgroup$ Apr 13, 2019 at 7:06

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

If you break it down as the following

5x5=10
6x6 = 10+8
7x7 = 18+18=10+8+10+8


if you look at the number of groups of

(10+8)

You'll see that in relation to the second number

5+0 = 5 , 5+1=6 , 5+2=7

so

5x5=10 ( zero groups of '8+10' )
6x6 = 10+8 ( one group of '8+10')
7x7 = 18+18=10+8+10+8 (two groups of '8+10')

if you follow the same logic

7x 8 , second number is 8 and 5+3 = 8
so
7*8 = (8+10)+(8+10)+(8+10) = 54

$\endgroup$
3
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I see that this answer has been accepted, but it doesn't make any sense at all to me. It's essentially saying that you ignore the first number and take (second number - 3) "groups of 10+8", i.e., that the answer is 3*(second number-3). But that doesn't work at all for the first example, and you only make it "work" here by arbitrarily using 10 instead of 0 when you have "zero groups of 8+10". $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Apr 13, 2019 at 11:39
  • $\begingroup$ @Gareth McCaughan yes you are correct; But until anyone post its another answer(with a better logic), this answer may be considered as a solution for 54 ,that's why accepted this answer $\endgroup$
    – Suresh
    Apr 14, 2019 at 10:15
  • $\begingroup$ I feel that this answer would be more suited for 8⋆8 than 7⋆8 $\endgroup$
    – ielyamani
    Apr 14, 2019 at 23:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.