2
$\begingroup$

I have filled all the possible singles. Also identified and shortlisted candidates, pointing pairs. How do I move ahead without guessing?

enter image description here

PS: I applied "Nishio", choosing one of the two possible candidate values on row 1, column 1. 7 will come in top left. Using which I can solve the rest of the puzzle. But it is "guessing". Any other way?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You can spot that

the 1, 7 cell cannot be a 4 (and therefore is an 8)

because

setting it to 4 forces an 8 into cell 5,7; which forces a 4 into cell 5,3; which eliminates 4 as a possibility from all of the remaining open cells in the top left block (cells 1,2 and 3,3).

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

You could spot that:

In the top left block, the bottom right 4/6 cell must be a 6.

Why?

Because if it is a 4 then in the bottom left block the right side becomes 5/6,5/6. But now the solution isn't unique as setting either of these cells as 5 has no vertical effect on the board (from the bottom right block).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am still unclear. What is the vertical effect in bottom right block please? $\endgroup$ – jerrymouse Dec 10 '18 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ I'm confused. Using (column,row) notation: setting (3,3) to 4 would require (1,7) to be 4, then (2,9) to be 8, (9,9) to be 5, (3,9) would be 6, and (3,8) would be 5. No ambiguity. $\endgroup$ – user3294068 Dec 10 '18 at 19:31
  • $\begingroup$ @user3294068; well it can't be a 4 according to OP's p.s. $\endgroup$ – JMP Dec 10 '18 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ @jerrymouse; if you follow my logic, we could have both 568:645 or 645:568 equally, which bears no impact on the rest of the grid. $\endgroup$ – JMP Dec 10 '18 at 19:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I might prefer guessing (brute force all options, doesn't seem too difficult here) to this approach, though: if you base any deductions on the solution's assumed uniqueness, you can only reach "an answer" at best. If you want to reach "the answer", you can't assume uniqueness, you have to prove it instead. $\endgroup$ – Bass Dec 10 '18 at 20:54
1
$\begingroup$

You can notice

r2c1, r7c1, r3c5, r7c5 form a finned X-Wing for 4.

Thus

Consider r2c1. It must be either 4 or 8. If r2c1 is 4 that forces r3c3 to be 6. If r2c1 is 8 that forces r7c1 to be 4 which forces r7c5 to be 8 which forces r3c5 to be 4 which forces r3c3 to be 6. So if r2c1 is either 4 or 8 r3c3 is forced to be 6.

Hopefully you can get it from there.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Rocus, welcome to PSE. Please hide your answers using ">!" $\endgroup$ – eye_am_groot Jan 18 at 16:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah. Just figured out how that works. This was my first answer. $\endgroup$ – Rocus Halbasch Jan 18 at 16:46
  • $\begingroup$ No problem. Happy puzzling! $\endgroup$ – eye_am_groot Jan 18 at 16:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.