0
$\begingroup$

456

I guess that these questions may use different logic independently or not i don't know. I just found one logic that fits only to the first one.

*These questions are from the one of high IQ Society founded by Xavier Jouve Ph.D for the top 0.3% of people along the IQ spectrum.

edit:other questions , last simillar type

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ does XJ explain the pattern of the boxes as a prelude to these type of puzzles anywhere? $\endgroup$ – JonMark Perry Nov 7 '18 at 7:31
  • $\begingroup$ No, these were totally new types. No additional information were given before. $\endgroup$ – user53678 Nov 7 '18 at 8:50
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, so they ARE separate puzzles rather than 3 pieces of one; thanks for the update. I don't know how much of a difference that makes but I feel like the logic between each can vary much more than if they were linked. Now, were 45-48 also the same type of puzzle? IE further examples of those above? $\endgroup$ – Dorrulf Nov 7 '18 at 22:20
  • $\begingroup$ link this is other questions, link this one only seems simillar type that left. sorry for my previously not mentioned about this. $\endgroup$ – user53678 Nov 7 '18 at 22:38
  • $\begingroup$ As you took this test, did you find that the previous questions, starting from 1, helped you develop a progressive understanding of the structure for the following problems? That is, by completing questions 1-10 in order, did you find you had a better understanding of the structure and what they were looking for in questions 11-20? In the end I guess I'm asking if you have a link to the test you took so that we may investigate to gain further insight into the specific questions you are asking about. $\endgroup$ – Dorrulf Nov 8 '18 at 1:08
2
$\begingroup$

I always found these kind of puzzles silly. There are an infinite number of justifications one could make -- and what you're really trying to do is predict the kind of justification a test-maker would deem sufficiently intelligent-sounding so as to warrant consideration.

That being said, here are my thoughts:

Puzzle 1

Answer 2. All blocks have to have at least one pair. A pair can either mean two white pieces adjacent to each other and in the same direction, or a single black piece anywhere in the same direction. We can rule out 1, 5, and 6 because they either don't have adjacent white pieces, or they have more than one black piece.

Puzzle 2

Answer 3. Pretty straightforward. You need a black block in every possible horizontal configuration to make a grouping of 'four.'

Puzzle 3

Answer 6. It's hard for me to fathom why any combination of pattern ideas would yield a completely distinct block from one already present. The most obvious answer would be half black (on top) and half white. Given that such a block is not present, perhaps the answer is as silly as "pick a block already present in the above diagram."

Edit: Fixed spoiler

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.