There is a unit-radius circle and you must form a polygon all of whose vertices are located on the circle, such as below:

enter image description here

What is the biggest possible value of the sum of squares of side lengths of such a polygon?

  • $\begingroup$ All the edges or all the vertices? I see no edges on the circle, and I believe what you describe is impossible without infinite edges. $\endgroup$
    – jpmc26
    Commented Oct 1, 2018 at 23:34
  • $\begingroup$ I have submitted an edit that's currently pending to clarify this issue. Note that the author considers the circle a filled-in solid object, hence the edges are "on" the circle. Hopefully the edit will go through soon to avoid future confusion. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2018 at 23:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Apollys Approved ;) $\endgroup$
    – Quintec
    Commented Oct 2, 2018 at 0:37

2 Answers 2


The greatest possible sum of the squares of the side lengths is

9, constructed using an equilateral triangle.

Details below; I have no spoilered them; read on at your peril.

    Lemma      If our polygon has any obtuse angle, we may remove an obtuse-angled vertex without reducing the sum of squared side lengths. (Nitpick: Not if it has only three vertices and we aren't prepared to consider degenerate two-sided "polygons".)

    Proof      Cosine rule.

    Corollary      A sum-of-squares-maximizing polygon either has only non-obtuse angles or is a triangle.

    Corollary      A sum-of-squares-maximizing polygon is a triangle or rectangle.

Thanks to Pythagoras, any rectangle has the same sum of squared side-lengths — namely, 8. Let us now consider triangles:

If the triangle's angles are $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ then the sum of squares is $2(\sin^2\alpha+\sin^2\beta+\sin^2\gamma)$. Maximizing this is the same as minimizing $S=\cos a+\cos b+\cos c$ where $a=2\alpha$ etc., so therefore $a+b+c=2\pi$.

We can't change $a,b,c$ independently because their sum is fixed. What happens if we increase $a$ a bit and decrease $b$ a bit? Well, $\frac{dS}{da}-\frac{dS}{db}=\sin b-\sin a$, so in an optimal triangle all of $a,b,c$ have the same sine; that is, any two of them differ by an even multiple of $\pi$ or add up to an odd multiple of $\pi$. Since they're all positive and add up to $2\pi$, this means that any pair are equal or add up to $\pi$.

If two of them add up to $\pi$ then the third must equal $\pi$. Therefore we have a right-angled triangle (remember that $a,b,$ and $c$ are double the angles of the triangle), and thanks to Pythagoras any such has the same sum of squared side-lengths, namely 8.

Otherwise, all the angles are equal, and we have an equilateral triangle, where all the sides have length $\sqrt{3}$, for a sum-of-squares of 9. This is clearly better than 8.

  • $\begingroup$ How do you know that making one of the angles of the triangle a little bigger and another of the angles a little smaller doesn't increase your total value? For me, this is the interesting part of the question (but maybe I missed something obvious). $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2018 at 23:50
  • $\begingroup$ Ooo! I read it as specifying a regular polygon but now you mention it it doesn't say anything of the kind -- it's just the diagrams that give that impression. So my answer is extremely incomplete. Let's see whether I can fix it. $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Commented Oct 2, 2018 at 0:31
  • $\begingroup$ OK, fixed. Thanks @Apollys for pointing out the error! $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Commented Oct 2, 2018 at 0:48
  • $\begingroup$ @GarethMcCaughan I think that makes sense... but I found it a bit difficult to understand fully so I suggested an edit. $\endgroup$
    – user46002
    Commented Oct 2, 2018 at 4:31
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. I have to confess that for my taste the edits make it harder rather than easier to read, but I don't feel strongly enough about it to revert them :-). $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Commented Oct 2, 2018 at 10:31

The maximum value you can get is

9, from a triangle


As you increase the number of sides, the square of the sides gets smaller faster than the increase in the number


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.