9
$\begingroup$

Seven persons - A, B, C, D, E, F and G – each of different height live on different floors of a seven storeyed building. The ground floor is considered the first floor and the floor just above the ground floor is considered second floor and so on. The following information is known about their heights and the floors on which they live.

Only two persons are shorter than E who lives neither on the third floor nor on the topmost floor. The number of persons who live between A and D is half the number of persons who live between C and G. G lives two floors above D who is neither the tallest nor the third tallest person. Both A and G the taller than both B and C. The one who is the tallest lives on the middle floor. The number of persons taller than B is equal to the number of persons shorter than G. The one who lives on the third floor is not the shortest.

Find the floors in which the people live and the ranking based on their height.

Source: Top rankers question bank

Or go to

here --> Banking and Insurance --> SBI PO 2018 --> Attempt the first free test --> go to question 93

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What question are you asking? I see the setup for a puzzle, but am not sure what's being asked $\endgroup$
    – puzzledPig
    Apr 22 '18 at 17:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ My assumption is determine who lives on what floor but yeah no question was explicitly stated... $\endgroup$
    – Einb
    Apr 22 '18 at 17:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think to put the order of the heights of a b - g and the level they live on. $\endgroup$
    – QuantumTwinkie
    Apr 22 '18 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ Has a correct answer been given? If so, please don't forget to $\color{green}{\checkmark \small\text{Accept}}$ it :) $\endgroup$
    – Rubio ♦
    Apr 30 '18 at 7:33
11
$\begingroup$

Known facts

Rewriting the information provided:

  1. E is #3 by height.
  2. E doesn't live on the 3rd or 7th floors.
  3. The number of floors between A and D is half the number of floors between C and G. (So these numbers are respectively (1,2) or (2,4), assuming the trivial (0,0) case is implicitly excluded.1)
  4. G lives two floors above D.
  5. D isn't #5 or #7 by height.
  6. A and G are taller than B and C. (So A and G aren't #1 or #2 by height, while B and C aren't #6 or #7.)
  7. The #7 by height lives on the 4th floor.
  8. The number of people taller than B equals the number shorter than G.
  9. The #1 by height does not live on the 3rd floor.

Deductions

Putting fact 8 together with the knowledge from fact 6 that G is taller than B, we know that B and G are respectively (#1,#7) or (#2,#6) or (#3,#5) by height. Fact 1 excludes (#3,#5). If it's (#1,#7), then G lives on the 4th floor by fact 7, so D lives on the 2nd floor by fact 4. By fact 3, contradiction. So

B, E, and G are respectively #2, #3, #6 by height.

By facts 5 and 6, the #7 by height isn't C or D, so it must be A or F.
If it's A, then A lives on the 4th floor. By fact 3, D must live on the 1st, 2nd, 6th, or 7th floor. By fact 4, it can't be the 2nd, 6th, or 7th. So D lives on the 1st floor and G on the 3rd floor. By fact 3, contradiction.

So F is #7 by height and lives on the 4th floor. By fact 5, the #5 by height must be one of A and C; so by fact 6, it's A.

Let's consider facts 3 and 4 together.

  • If there's one floor between A and D, then there are two between C and G; in this case, A lives two floors below D and four below G, so C lives three floors below G, between A and D: ?,A,C,D,*,G,?. None of A, C, D, G are on the 4th floor, so we must have them respectively on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th floors, with two more floors above G.
  • If there's two floors between A and D, then there are four between C and G. Option one: A lives three floors below D and five below G, leaving nowhere for C, contradiction. Option two: A lives three floors above D and one above G while C lives five floors below G: ?,C,*,*,D,*,G,A,?. In this case, A, C, D, G must live respectively on the 7th, 1st, 4th, 6th floors. But F is on the 4th floor, contradiction.

So it must be the first of the above bullet points that applies. Now B and E must live on the 6th and 7th floors, and we know which way round by fact 2. Also, C and D must be #1 and #4 by height, and we know which way round by fact 9 since D lives on the 3rd floor.

Final answer

A #5 1st
B #2 7th
C #1 2nd
D #4 3rd
E #3 6th
F #7 4th
G #6 5th


1 I found this to be a natural assumption, as (0,0) seems like a 'trick' solution not in the spirit of the puzzle. Turns out this assumption is also required for the puzzle to have a unique solution - see NL628's answer for a valid alternative solution if (0,0) is permitted.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah this is def the correct answer :D Good job :P $\endgroup$
    – NL628
    Apr 22 '18 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ I was very confused at first by the fact you were ranking the height with the shortest as #1 rather than the tallest... Also was there any specific reason to exclude the 0,0 case for your data point #3 or just a guess that the puzzle creators probably didn't have that in mind? I'd personally have assumed 0,0 was possible until I proved otherwise. Edit: I see from comments on another answer that excluding this gives uniqueness which is a reasonable reason to exclude it in my opinion (sine the creators almost certainly intended a unique solution so you can use this fact to guess their intent). $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Apr 23 '18 at 8:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Chris 1 is a smaller (shorter) number than 7 :-P Re (0,0), it seemed natural to me to exclude that 'trick' solution anyway, and I'd started working on this answer before realising what the problem was with NL628's answer. But maybe I should add a note to justify the assumption ... $\endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 23 '18 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah. I think an extra note would be good - I certainly thought 0,0 would be acceptable (probably because I'm a mathematician so think like that) so adding a note would probably be worthwhile. Especially since there is a better reason than "I don't think that is what the puzzle author intended". Though of course whether ensuring uniqueness is a valid reason to make a choice in a puzzle is another matter. :) $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Apr 23 '18 at 12:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Chris Done :-) (I'm also a mathematician, which is probably why I thought to even mention this trivial case at all, even in order to exclude it!) $\endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 23 '18 at 13:06
7
$\begingroup$

I feel that there is more than one solution...

But here is one that I found.

In order of shortest to tallest,

BCEDFAG

In order from 1st floor to 7th floor,

ADCGFEB

Could someone verify that my answer works? Thanks.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "The number of persons who live between A and D is half the number of persons who live between C and G." Your solution sort of satisfies this, but only in a 'trick' way. Perhaps the puzzle meant to exclude this vacuous 'trick' solution? $\endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 22 '18 at 19:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ ^ indeed, with this 'trick' excluded, there is a unique solution $\endgroup$
    – Rand al'Thor
    Apr 22 '18 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ "Could someone verify that my answer works? Thanks." - why can you not verify it yourself? Also what was the workings you used to get here or did you just guess? $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Apr 23 '18 at 8:27
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris I don't want to be rude, but I have been on puzzling long enough to know that I should verify my own solution, so clearly I did. I just wanted to make sure. $\endgroup$
    – NL628
    Apr 24 '18 at 3:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @NL628: Sorry, my comment perhaps came out wrong. It was mainly I didn't see the point of that comment in your answer and I see I definitely didn't come across in the way I intended to (for which I blame the internet for losing the tone I was going for). People always verify answers (I would hope there would be no upvotes without checking it was correct) and comment if they find problems and such like so asking to do so seems redundant. Apologies again for the comment. $\endgroup$
    – Chris
    Apr 24 '18 at 8:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.