11
$\begingroup$

Can you work out the mathematical rule for these number sequences? It is the same rule for both sequences

2, 4, 16, 7, 49, 25, 9, 81, 9, 81....

8, 64, 22, 6, 36, 15, 6, 36, 15....

Hint 1

this is a mathematical puzzle

From time to time hints will be updated.

Note: this sequence cannot be found in The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

$\endgroup$
18
$\begingroup$

Is it...

Finding the smallest digit, squaring it, then adding with other digits.

$2$ -> $2^2$ = $4$.
$4$ -> $4^2$ = $16$.
$16$ -> $1^2 + 6$ = $7$.
$7$ -> $7^2$ = $49$.
$49$ -> $4^2 + 9$ = $25$.
$25$ -> $2^2+5$ = $9$.
...

And that's why $64$ -> $4^2 + 6$ = $22$.
Trivia: The numbers will not exceed 99 btw.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Very nice, this seems to be the cleanest fit! $\endgroup$ – Phylyp Mar 16 '18 at 4:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Even more trivia: the numbers won't exceed 81. (For any 2-digit number, the next number will be strictly smaller) $\endgroup$ – Bass Mar 16 '18 at 9:25
  • $\begingroup$ Great, Well done! $\endgroup$ – tom Mar 16 '18 at 10:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Bass good point, though note that 98 --> 73 and 9 --> 81, but 99-->90 (compare with 22-->6 in question). Having said that you cannot get to 99 starting from a single digit. $\endgroup$ – tom Mar 16 '18 at 13:05
6
$\begingroup$

I am not sure if this is the intended pattern, but it could be:

The sum of all digits, where the lowest (non zero) digit is squared. For numbers less than ten there is only one digit, so it will simply be the square of that number.
Some (non-consecutive) examples from the question:
4 -> 16 because 4 is the lowest (and only) digit, so it is squared
16 -> 7 because 1 is the lowest digit, is squared, and added to 6
36 -> 15 because 3 is the lowest digit, is squared, and added to 6

EDIT: Same as athin's answer, just a few minutes slower (and without the interesting trivia)

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Ninja'd by athin $\endgroup$ – somebody Mar 16 '18 at 4:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great, well done, +1! $\endgroup$ – tom Mar 16 '18 at 10:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.