So we've got: Stackreader (P1), Boboquack (P2), Rand al'Thor (P3) and Brent Hackers (P4) and they state as follows:
- P1.1: [P2,P3,P4] contains at least 2 F(alse)
- P2.1: [P3,P4] are the only F -> [P1,P2] are thus T(rue)
- P2.2: [P3,P4] are both T
- P3.1: [P1] is the only F -> [P1,P2,P4] are thus T
- P4.1: [P3] is the only F -> [P1,P2,P4] are thus F
- P4.2: [P3] is the only T -> paradoxal statement
Let's assume that statement P4.1 is T, thus [P1,P2,P4] are T, let's
check:
- P1 = T -> Should be at least two F, thus contradicts P4.1
- P2 = T -> P4 is not F, so P3 should be T too, thus contradicts P4.1
Let's assume that statement P3.1 is T, thus [P2,P3,P4] are T, let's check:
- P2 = T -> P3 & P4 are T, thus consistent
- P4 = T -> either a paradox or a contradiction
Let's assume that statement P2.2 is T, thus [P3.P4] are T, let's check:
- P3 = T -> P1 is F, so far consistent
- P4 = T -> either a paradox or contradiction
Let's assume that statement P2.1 is T, thus [P1,P2] are T and [P3,P4] are F:
- P1 = T -> [P3,P4] are F, so at least 2 are F, thus consistent
Taking all that together means that P1 and P2 are T, whilst P3 and P4 are F.
In other words:
Stackreader & Boboquack are telling the truth.
Rand al'Thor & Brent Hackers are lieing.