2
$\begingroup$

Find the next entry in each of this pair of related sequences:

1, 4, 6, 8, 9, ?

Bobby, Joe, Johnny, Carl, Ted, ?

Note: There's no way to solve this without making use of both sequences - it's unsolvable with only the numbers.

Hint:

The next entries in the sequences after the ones I'm looking for are 26 and Wade respectively.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Is it safe to assume that no worldly knowledge is needed, such as familiarity with actual persons with those names? $\endgroup$ – humn Oct 8 '17 at 6:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @humn That is not safe to assume. $\endgroup$ – isaacg Oct 8 '17 at 15:01
7
$\begingroup$

1, 4, 6, 8, 9, ?

    ... 14, 26, 27, 34, 45   =   uniform numbers retired by baseball’s Boston Red Sox

Bobby, Joe, Johnny, Carl, Ted, ?

            ... Jim, Wade, Carlton, David, Pedro   =   first names of the players

The hint made it clear.   You see, ever since...

...Babe Ruth pitched for Boston (who didn’t bother to retire his uniform #), I’ve been a fan of Boston’s lefty batters.   The “Wade” (Boggs) hint rang a bell for “Ted” (Williams) and “Carl” (Yastremski, who was on the team with two others here when I once got to a game at Fenway Park).   Here’s the list:

Bobby Doerr, uniform #1
Joe Cronin, uniform #4
Johnny Pesky, uniform #6
Carl Yastremski, uniform #8
Ted Williams, uniform #9
Jim Rice, uniform #14
Wade (from hint) Boggs, uniform #26
Carlton Fisk, uniform #27
David Ortiz, uniform #34
Pedro Martinez, uniform #45

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Uh, oh, baseball.:) (After the first partial answer was out, I hoped that the numbers would be non-primes and the names those of prime ministers of some country or other ...) $\endgroup$ – M Oehm Oct 10 '17 at 5:25
  • $\begingroup$ Like minds..., @MOehm, before the hint I looked up prime ministers too! (And those who weren't elected PM.) $\endgroup$ – humn Oct 10 '17 at 5:27
  • $\begingroup$ nice, i got wade boggs but know nothing about baseball and couldn't link the other numbers to players $\endgroup$ – Jeffmagma Oct 11 '17 at 2:31
1
$\begingroup$

Partial answer.

The next term of the first sequence is 10.

Why? Because the first sequence is the sequence of non-prime integers (OEIS A018252), and this is how we get the first 5 terms:$$1\space\space\color{red}2\space\space\color{red}3\space\space4\space\space\color{red}5\space\space6\space\space\color{red}7\space\space8\space\space9$$The terms in red are excluded. The sequence is (0-indexed)$$\alpha_n=f(n+1,0)\\f(x,y)=((x=0\rightarrow y)\land(x>0\rightarrow f(x-((\Omega(y)\ne1\rightarrow1)\land(\Omega(y)=1\rightarrow0)),y+1)))\\\Omega(x)=\text{Count of prime factors of }x\text{ including duplicates}$$Since $10$ is the next non-prime integer, it's the next term of the sequence.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ It could just as well be 12: non-prime numbers of the form \$2^a 3^b\$ $\endgroup$ – Peter Taylor Oct 8 '17 at 12:42
  • $\begingroup$ @PeterTaylor Can you post that as an answer please? $\endgroup$ – EKons Oct 8 '17 at 13:07
0
$\begingroup$

The next number in the list can be

22

Based on this list

$\endgroup$
-1
$\begingroup$

These can be non-prime numbers:


https://oeis.org/search?q=1%2c%204%2c%206%2c%208%2c%209%2c


$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.