-5
$\begingroup$

A real estate developer has built a new office building of six floors, and numbered the floors 1 through 6 from bottom to top. Each of the six companies — F, G, I, J, K, and M — must be assigned an entire floor for office space. The floors must be assigned according to the following conditions:

  • F must be on a floor lower than G
  • I must be either on the floor immediately above M or on the floor immediately below M
  • J can be neither on the floor immediately above M not the floor immediately below M
  • K must be on floor 4

Q7: Which of the following is an acceptable assignment of companies to floors 1 through 6?

G, I, M, K, F, J

J, F, G, K, I, M

J, M, I, F, G, K

K, F, J, G, M, I

Q8: If M is on floor 2, any one of the following could be true EXCEPT:

F is on floor 3

I is on floor 1

K is on floor 5

J is on floor 6

Q9: If J is on floor 3, which of the following pairs of companies cannot be on consecutive floors?

M and J

F and K

G and J

K and M

Q10: If F is on floor 5, which of the following cannot be true?

G is on floor 4

K is on floor 4

M is on floor 2

M is on floor 3

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please edit by changing company 'I' to a different alphabet for better readability:-) $\endgroup$ – Mea Culpa Nay Sep 28 '17 at 5:17
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ What about Q 1-6? Where did you get this questions from? here at Puzzling we like to attribute our sources. $\endgroup$ – micsthepick Sep 28 '17 at 5:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ this 'puzzle' is ridiculously easy. $\endgroup$ – JMP Sep 28 '17 at 7:17
  • $\begingroup$ Did this come from an LSAT? $\endgroup$ – Acccumulation Sep 28 '17 at 17:45
4
$\begingroup$

For No. 7:

Instructions say that F must be lower than G. and K must be at 4. So, only option 2 satisfies the required condition.

For no. 8:

Again K must be at 4. So, Option 3 is always wrong (Hence, the correct answer).

For no. 9:

Option 1 is again wrong (and thus the correct option) because it violates the condition that J and M can't be in consecutive floors.

For no. 10:

Option 1 can't be true (and again, the correct option) because G has to be higher than F. And if, F is at 5, G has to be at 6. Alternative method is that K is always at 4. Hence, G can never be at 4. That also leads to the same answer.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.