Solve the nonogram.
(Click for a larger version.)
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
8
-
25$\begingroup$ I think your definition of simple differs from mine $\endgroup$– Beastly GerbilMar 2, 2017 at 15:41
-
2$\begingroup$ I'm a little way through and it seems clear what kind of thing is happening. Nice! $\endgroup$– Gareth McCaughan ♦Mar 2, 2017 at 15:57
-
7$\begingroup$ "Ah. This is obviously some strange usage of the word simple that I hadn't previously been aware of." $\endgroup$– Rubio ♦Mar 2, 2017 at 15:58
-
2$\begingroup$ (I have a comment to make about the "simple" thing but will refrain for now.) $\endgroup$– Gareth McCaughan ♦Mar 2, 2017 at 15:58
-
4$\begingroup$ The comment I was going to make was: I'm pretty sure there is in fact a simple nonogram in this puzzle. (And lo, there is.) $\endgroup$– Gareth McCaughan ♦Mar 2, 2017 at 17:18
|
Show 3 more comments
2 Answers
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
1
Final answer is
or perhaps I should say
PSE.
I confess that I only bothered going this far by strict logical inference
before allowing myself to make the obvious assumptions about the structure of the solution, leading to this (where white and yellow should now be treated as equivalent):
whereupon it's clear how to get to the solution at the top.
answered Mar 2, 2017 at 17:16
-
1$\begingroup$ After you had mentioned the "nice thing" in the comments I noticed the positions of the empty rows and columns and suspected a nested nonogram (Nonogramyoshka?). But you had a headstart of an hour and I had little hope of beating you. Nice, indeed! $\endgroup$– M OehmMar 2, 2017 at 17:21
0
