14
$\begingroup$

All in all: out of bed! Time the morning to greet!
Minus one and the statesman is losing his seat.
Minus two: it's a hue or a kind of a smirch.
Minus three, in a way, nothing short of a perch.
Minus four, time to flee! Run away in defeat!
Minus five, a big rat a king's daughter might meet.

The answer is a single English word.

Added the trivia tag for the last line.

| improve this question | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do we rearrange letters between words? $\endgroup$ – Chris Cudmore Jan 13 '17 at 19:30
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisCudmore No rearrangement needed. $\endgroup$ – Hugh Meyers Jan 13 '17 at 19:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This seems like a deluxe version of the Add-A-Gram. $\endgroup$ – GentlePurpleRain♦ Jan 13 '17 at 20:58
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ And, just to be clear, minus N+1 is always obtained by removing one letter from minus N (rather than each being an independent subtraction from the original word)? $\endgroup$ – Gareth McCaughan♦ Jan 14 '17 at 13:16
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @GarethMcCaughan Good question. I missed Add-A-Gram so maybe this is misleading. Each line is an independent operation on the original word. $\endgroup$ – Hugh Meyers Jan 14 '17 at 16:07
6
$\begingroup$

The answer is

ROUST.

All in all: out of bed! Time the morning to greet!

Definition of ROUST.

Minus one and the statesman is losing his seat.

The statesman is OUSTed.

Minus two: it's a hue or a kind of a smirch.

RUST can be a colour or a smirch.

Minus three, in a way, nothing short of a perch.

ROST - one letter short of a roost.

Minus four, time to flee! Run away in defeat!

The fleeing army is in a ROUT.

Minus five, a big rat a king's daughter might meet.

ROUS

princess bride

Feedback section

Excellent riddle. Once I got the right answer, pretty much everything fell into place perfectly; nothing else could have fit the clues.
I got the last line first (being a fantasy buff probably helped - I'd had that particular work in mind for a long time even when I was thinking the answer would be PEA), and then the second-to-last line followed quite easily as the two words are similar.
At that point I was confused, having assumed each line described a word with one fewer letter than the previous line. But the singular version fit better than the plural for the second-to-last line, and I had a niggling feeling that maybe the numbers referred to positions rather than numbers of letters. And when I tried this idea, it worked perfectly right away.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Well done! My sincere congratulations! $\endgroup$ – Hugh Meyers Jan 14 '17 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Hugh Aha, that fits! Answer completed and feedback section added. $\endgroup$ – Rand al'Thor Jan 14 '17 at 18:37
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, very nice. I fell into (I think) the same trap as just about everyone else -- I thought it was a matter of removing more and more letters for each line. I'm not sure whether that was a deliberate red herring (if so, I think maybe a little unfair?) or accident. $\endgroup$ – Gareth McCaughan♦ Jan 14 '17 at 19:48
  • $\begingroup$ @GarethMcCaughan I meant to leave the meaning of the minuses up in the air but I didn't mean to positively imply something other than the actual solution. I'm not sure why pretty much everyone took the same wrong path at first. Maybe the similarities to Add-A-Gram (which I hadn't seen) or maybe the word "successive" in the title was a poor choice. $\endgroup$ – Hugh Meyers Jan 15 '17 at 9:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.