# Oct - Dots and Boxes on Steroids! [closed]

This game originally came about as the solution to the question: "How can I make Hex with more than 6 directions?"

After playing a couple of games of 'Hept' and 'Oct' on their respective tilings of the hyperbolic plane, I realized that it was possible to translate the gameplay of 'Oct' back onto an ordinary, euclidean flat square grid, simply by book-keeping the connections made by the players.

This is done by explicitly marking the connections with lines on the board as they are made. The book-keeping happens automatically in original Hex because the hexagonal tiling doesn't have ambiguity about which spaces are touching. On the octagonal tiling of the hyperbolic plane, there isn't this problem either, but as you can see from the linked picture, playing on an octagonal hyperbolic board would be inconvenient.

A flat grid has 8 possible directions from each space (counting diagonals), like the hyperbolic octagon tiling, but there is the problem that on the flat grid, squares that are diagonally touching are ambiguously connected.

While playing 'Oct' on the hyperbolic grid, I noticed the implicit connection rule:

An octagon is assumed to be connected to any of the other 8 octagons in its vicinity that have already been marked by the same player.

On the Hex and Octagon grids, this 'connection book-keeping' is automatically done for us by the board, but it's simple enough to do this ourselves on a square grid:

Each turn, we simply draw a line (connection) between our current square, and any of our previously marked squares in its 8-square vicinity, unless they would cross our opponent's connection(s).

So in conclusion, I give you the rules for playing "8-way Hex," or 'Oct.' Since it is played with pencil and paper, you can think of it as "Dots and Boxes on Steroids!"

~OCT~

Number of Players: 2

Setup/Board Description: Square Grid (such as graph paper.) The Top and Bottom edges are owned by Player 1, and the Left and Right edges are owned by Player 2. Corners are shared.

Board Sizes and Play Times: 15 min - 11x11, 30 min - 16x16, 60 min - 22x22

Overview: Each player tries to connect their two edges of the board by drawing dots and connecting them together.

Each turn:

• A player draws a dot in ANY empty square on the board.

• Then the player connects it (draws a line) to all of their adjacent dots in the eight adjoining squares, unless it would cross an opponent's connection.

Win condition: A player connects their two edges of the board.

Pie rule (optional, this rule nullifies the 1st player's inherent advantage): After the first move is made, the second player has one of two options:

1) Letting the move stand, in which case the second player remains the second player and moves immediately, or

2) Switching places, in which case the second player becomes the first-moving player, and the "new" second player then makes their "first" move. (I.e., the game proceeds from the opening move already made, but with roles reversed.)

~A Beginner's Problem~

In the following 7x7 newbie game, Red moved at d3, then Blue at b4, then Red at d5. So it's Blue's turn to move. (Edit: The players are using the pie rule.) Is there any way:

1a) Blue can stop red from forming a connection between d3 and d5?

1b) If not, where should have Blue moved instead of b4 on their last turn? Edit: That is, what move should Blue have played to prevent Red from forming such a strong vertical connection early on?

2) Can Blue stop Red from winning the game at this point (i.e., has Red already won)?

## closed as unclear what you're asking by IAmInPLS, Peregrine Rook, Gamow, JonMark Perry, MithrandirDec 29 '16 at 10:40

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Welcome to Puzzling! This is a Q&A site for questions about puzzles or puzzles themselves; this does not appear to be a question. – Deusovi Dec 28 '16 at 21:12
• Hi Eriek, interesting post! But to make it more on-topic, maybe you should ask some follow-up questions about, for instance, the theory of your game (strategies, potential problems, etc.)? – GoldenGremlin Dec 28 '16 at 21:18
• @ Silenius. Will do! – Eriek Dec 28 '16 at 21:24
• It seems very hard for the second player (after the pie rule, if applied) to win, since this game requires three dots to block the progression of the other player. – justhalf Dec 29 '16 at 3:43