13
$\begingroup$

The following cryptic message is supposed to tell me the secret code I have to give the guard that he lets me in.

A bone and a bone are a cone on a bone.

A bone on a cone is the opposite of a cone on a bone.

The opposite of a stone is a stone.

A stone on a bone and the opposite of a cone on a bone are a bone.

A stone on a bone for each bone on a cone is a stone on a bone on a cone.

A cone and a bone on a cone are the opposite of a stone on a bone.

A cone for each stone on a bone is a stone on a cone.

A cone on a bone for each cone on a bone is a bone on a bone.

What are a stone on a cone on a bone and a stone on a bone?

Apparently I need to tell the guard a specific stack of objects. But what is it?

Here's a hint I've found in a fortune cookie:

Remember that every thing has value.

A manager gave me this valuable hint:

Your power depends on your position.

The following insight from a self-help book might also be helpful:

We also need the negative things in life.

I've also got a hint from a TV series fan:

You really should know the power of three.

$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ I'm not sure whether to get stoned or a boner now $\endgroup$
    – Avigrail
    Aug 19, 2016 at 5:51
  • $\begingroup$ Seeing as we're talking about stacks, should "the opposite of A on B" mean, "B on A"? $\endgroup$
    – RoadieRich
    Aug 19, 2016 at 15:59
  • $\begingroup$ @RoadieRich: No. $\endgroup$
    – celtschk
    Aug 19, 2016 at 16:41

3 Answers 3

4
$\begingroup$

OK, we have a lot of hints now and I think they're enough.

We are working in

balanced ternary

and "X on Y on Z" means

the balanced-ternary number ZYX; that is, X + 3Y + 9Z

where

a bone is +1, a cone is -1, and a stone is 0.

The other operations are

"and" = addition, "for each" = multiplication, "opposite" = negation.

Accordingly, a stone on a cone on a bone and a stone on a bone equal

[0 + 3*(-1) + 9] + [0 + 3] = 9

which we describe as

a stone on a stone on a bone.

Let's go through the statements we've been given and check them.

A bone and a bone are a cone on a bone.

1 + 1 = (-1) + 3*1. 2 on both sides, check.

A bone on a cone is the opposite of a cone on a bone.

1 + 3*(-1) = -[-1 + 3*(1)]. -2 on both sides, check.

The opposite of a stone is a stone.

-0 = 0, check.

A stone on a bone and the opposite of a cone on a bone are a bone.

0 + 3*1 - (-1 + 3*1) = 1.

A stone on a bone for each bone on a cone is a stone on a bone on a cone.

(0 + 3*1) * (1 + 3*-1) = 0 + 3*1 + 9*-1. -6 on both sides, check.

A cone and a bone on a cone are the opposite of a stone on a bone.

[-1] + [1 + 3*-1] = -[0 + 3*1]. -3 on both sides, check.

A cone for each stone on a bone is a stone on a cone.

-1 * (0 + 3*1) = (0 + 3*-1). -3 on both sides, check.

A cone on a bone for each cone on a bone is a bone on a bone.

(-1 + 3*1) * (-1 + 3*1) = (1 + 3*1), or 2*2=4, check.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You got it! Bone. $\endgroup$
    – celtschk
    Aug 22, 2016 at 14:34
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In fairness, by the time I looked at it today the hints were more or less a solution :-). Then again, there's a geometry-ish puzzle still open where the hints are basically a very detailed solution outline and everyone, including me, has been avoiding the work of actually doing it... $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Aug 22, 2016 at 14:38
3
$\begingroup$

This can only be a partial solution, because I don't understand any rule which contains the word "each". Anyway, Let $s$ = a stone, $c$ = a cone, $b$ = a bone, $1$ = a stack with nothing on it. Say $x+y$ for $x$ and $y$, and $xy$ for $x$ on $y$. Say $x^{-1}$ for the opposite of $x$. Say $xy=1$ or $yx=1$ if it's stated that $x$ is the opposite to $y$. (Actually, seeing as we have two operators, "and" and "on", I am not sure which operator "opposite" refers to.) Then

$$ \begin{matrix} & b+b & = & cb & [1]\\ & bc & = & (cb)^{-1} & [2]\\ & ss & = & 1 & [3] \\ & sb+(cb)^{-1} & = & b & [4] \\ & c+bc & = & (sb)^{-1} & [6] \\ \Rightarrow & sb & = & b+cb & (4) \\ &&=&b+b+b & (1)\\ & sb+c+bc & = & 1 & (6)\\ \Rightarrow & b+c & = & 1\\ & scb & = & s(b+b) & (1) \\ && = & sb+sb\\ \Rightarrow & scb+sb & = & sb+sb+sb \\ && = & b+b+b+b+b+b+b+b+b \end{matrix} $$

At least, that's one interpretation. Of course, I might've been attacking quite the wrong problem.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ You're partly on the right way, but not completely. Interestingly, your first conclusion (the line labelled $(4)$) doesn't seem to follow from the preceding lines (at least I cannot see how), but translates to a correct statement. $\endgroup$
    – celtschk
    Aug 19, 2016 at 7:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Since we deal with stacks of at least 2 objects probably the opposite of y/x would be x/y. For a stack made of 1 object the extra condition opposite of x = x is given in line 3 since 1/x wouldn't make sense. $\endgroup$
    – Avigrail
    Aug 19, 2016 at 9:12
  • $\begingroup$ Surely 4 is just what you get by combining "A stone on a bone and the opposite of a cone on a bone are a bone" and "A bone on a cone is the opposite of a cone on a bone", so it's not surprising it's correct. $\endgroup$
    – Gareth McCaughan
    Aug 19, 2016 at 16:50
  • $\begingroup$ In my interpretation of the question I too came up with a system of equations, but I didn't interpret stacks to be multiplication, or opposites to be inverses. $\endgroup$
    – Avik Mohan
    Aug 19, 2016 at 17:17
-1
$\begingroup$

Is it:

A stone?

Based on:

stone = 1; bone = 2; cone = 4;

Where:

'on' is to divide, 'and' is to add, and 'for each' is to multiply.

A bone and a bone are a cone on a bone.

b+b = c/b, thus c=2b.

A bone on a cone is the opposite of a cone on a bone.

I assume this to mean, b/c is the opposite of c/b

The opposite of a stone is a stone.

This only holds for 1/1, so s=1

A stone on a bone and the opposite of a cone on a bone are a bone.

Math happened. B=2 and C=4

So I skipped ahead and tried my theory so far.

What are a stone on a cone on a bone and a stone on a bone?

(1/4)/2 + 1/2 = 1

There might be a valid statement in there, but I doubt it....

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No. And your interpretation already violates the first statement: "a bone and a bone" would be 4, while "a cone on a bone" would be 2. $\endgroup$
    – celtschk
    Aug 19, 2016 at 21:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.