Inspired by this question.

A wealthy, famous eccentric had a huge cube of equal sized diamonds.* Due to her eccentricities the number of diamonds was known to be both palindromic in base ten, and a multiple of $7$ - her lucky number.

* That is a cube of $n^3 | n \in \Bbb{N}$ diamonds.

One day $7$ thieves stole the cube and got away in a spaceship. They planned to break the cube up to share the diamonds out equally, since it would be too difficult to sell such a unique piece anywhere in the system.

During the flight $2$ of the thieves decided to do away with the other $5$ thieves and share the diamonds equally, however they found that $1$ diamond would be left over.

As they discovered this a third thief discovered them, and suggested they do away with the other $4$ thieves instead and again share the diamonds equally. Again there would be $1$ diamond left over, and again as they discovered this a fourth thief discovered them.

The process repeated until the seventh thief found the others plotting against him, and still with a single remaining diamond after splitting them into $6$ equal shares.

What was the minimum number of diamonds in the cube?

  • $\begingroup$ The Seventh thief found them and found there'd be 1 left after spitting it in SIX? equal shares? What about thief #7 doesn't he get diamonds? $\endgroup$ – dcfyj Jun 10 '16 at 12:07
  • $\begingroup$ @dcfyj When the $6$ were sharing equally there would be $1$ remaining diamond. They already know the number of diamonds is divisible by $7$ due to the well publicised peculiarities of the famous eccentric. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 10 '16 at 12:12

I believe there were

1033394994933301 diamonds, in a cube 101101 on a side.

Solution by semi-brainless computer search. Here's the code (though the code I actually used -- and briefly had here -- had a stupid bug which by mere good luck happened not to make it find the wrong answer).

for n in range(1,100000000):
  m = 420*n+301
  m = m**3 # number is a cube
  s = str(m)
  if s != s[::-1]: continue

The only non-obvious things here are:

  • m = 420*n+301: for k=2,3,4,5,6 it happens that $n^3=1$ mod k iff $n=1$ mod k, so the side length of our cube must be 1 mod 60. It also happens to be a multiple of 7, which means it needs to be 301 mod 420 as per the earlier puzzle linked from the question here.
  • s[::-1]: terse but unobvious Pythonese for reversing a sequence.
  • $\begingroup$ $1685^3=4,784,094,125$, not 1033394994933301. $\endgroup$ – Trenin Jun 10 '16 at 12:34
  • $\begingroup$ Er, no, sorry, 1685 is the value of n, not of 60n+1. Will fix. $\endgroup$ – Gareth McCaughan Jun 10 '16 at 12:35
  • $\begingroup$ 1685 per side there are 6 sides to a cube $\endgroup$ – dcfyj Jun 10 '16 at 12:35
  • $\begingroup$ @dcfyj Um... what? $\endgroup$ – Trenin Jun 10 '16 at 12:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And 7 divides 101101, too. $\endgroup$ – Rosie F Jun 10 '16 at 12:38

You don't actually say that when the 5th thief discovered the other 4 and demanded that the diamonds be divided into 5, that there would be 1 left over. So I suggest that there are 343 diamonds.

  • $\begingroup$ "The process repeated" $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 10 '16 at 12:32
  • $\begingroup$ upv for creativity though :) $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 10 '16 at 12:39

I believe the answer is:

10801 diamonds


if divided by 7 you get 1543 and if divided by any of the other numbers you get a remainder of 1. And also because it's the lowest palindromic number that fits the bill

I found the answer by using this:

vb.net code
For i As Integer = 0 To 50000
If i Mod 7 = 0 AndAlso i Mod 6 = 1 AndAlso i Mod 5 = 1 AndAlso i Mod 4 = 1 AndAlso i Mod 3 = 1 AndAlso i Mod 2 = 1 Then
txtPass.Text &= i.ToString() & "| "
End If

  • $\begingroup$ Unfortunately the answer you have given is not a cube of a natural number. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 10 '16 at 12:21
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That wasn't stated in the question, but ok. $\endgroup$ – dcfyj Jun 10 '16 at 12:22
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I will add it explicitly to the text, I'd thought "cube of equal sized diamonds" was enough to specify this fact. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Allan Jun 10 '16 at 12:23
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To me that just sounded like a cube, as in a boxed shaped object $\endgroup$ – dcfyj Jun 10 '16 at 12:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.