What historical event does the following rebus represent? $$ \therefore \forall A, B: (A \cap B = \emptyset) \implies (A \neq B) $$
Hint:
$\forall x \in S, \text{ where } |S| = 9.$ This isn't a rebus, but it describes one aspect of the event.
Puzzling Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those who create, solve, and study puzzles. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityWhat historical event does the following rebus represent? $$ \therefore \forall A, B: (A \cap B = \emptyset) \implies (A \neq B) $$
Hint:
$\forall x \in S, \text{ where } |S| = 9.$ This isn't a rebus, but it describes one aspect of the event.
My guess is:
Brown v. Board of Education
Explanation:
Brown v. Board of Education refuted the idea of the "separate, but equal" doctrine. The main statement is that if sets A and B are disjoint, then it's implied A is not equal to B. Another way to describe disjoint sets is separate. So in other words, if A and B are separate, they are NOT equal.
As for the hint (credit goes to pacoverflow for figuring this out):
Brown v. Board of Education was a unanimous 9-0 decision and there are 9 elements in set S (the set of Supreme Court members with concurring opinions).
Hm. Well, a literal translation yields:
Therefore, all sets that don't intersect are not the same.
I'm not sure how to relate this to a common phrase yet.
do intersect
$\endgroup$