# Highest number of mates

In chess, what position has the highest number of checkmates in 1 move for a given side? You can have as many of each piece as you want, except for the king (you get exactly one). Bishops can be same color. Other color can have only the king, or other pieces if you want to. Rules same as chess rules. Pieces can be:

Queen
Rook
Bishop
Knight
Pawn
1 King (a must)

• what do you mean by the highest number of mate in 1s for 1 color? Apr 6, 2016 at 12:30
• makes sense to me. Put pieces on the board such that the number of moves which constitute a mate in 1 is maximised, for either black or white Apr 6, 2016 at 12:41
• Edited question to be clearer and voted to reopen. Please tell me if this isn't what you meant. Apr 6, 2016 at 13:15
• define 'legitimate position'? Apr 6, 2016 at 13:26
• @PaulEvans You added the phrase 'legitimate position'. What did you mean, or what do you think OP meant? Apr 6, 2016 at 13:39

The highest number of one-move mates that I have found is currently 91. It is based off of the following idea:

RB.....K
........
......Q.
........
........
........
........
........


Here, each dot or letter represents a square on the board. There are 7 positions that the bishop can move to, so I would count this as 7 different moves that end in check mate, ie. 7 different 1 move mates. When counting the total number of moves that mate from each piece in the board, I will represent it like this:

07.....K
........
......0.
........
........
........
........
........


I found the following board based off of this idea that has a total of 91 different moves which result in checkmate:

B..RQ.BQ
Q....R..
..RB....
RB.K.B.Q
Q......Q
.R......
B..B..R.
Q..QQQQB


Where many pieces have several possible mates (a=10, b=11):

0..03.02
2....8..
..7b....
03.K.a.1
3......3
.a......
0..7..9.
2..13220


There might be a small permutation of this board which increases in incrementally, but I am interested in what other ideas people have from scratch.

• How have you found this board ? manually or computer ? Apr 6, 2016 at 15:08
• @Lordofdark Manually. I started off with the exterior rooks and bishops that will mate the king, then added in their blockers. I then added queens anywhere I could to get a few extra moves, and turned some of the exterior pieces to queens to get the last 2 mates. Apr 6, 2016 at 15:12
• Replacing the d8 rook with a queen and moving it to d7 gives one extra checkmate Q7-e5++ Jan 9, 2023 at 8:52

A bit late to the party, but here's 142 checkmates:

The K in the middle is the black king. Every number is a white queen, with the number indicating the number of ways to mate with that queen. I got this through the following reasoning:

1. arbitrarily choose black to be mated
2. The question asks for the highest number of mates for 1 side, not both sides, so clearly the mated side should only have a king and no other pieces, as any other pieces would just get in the way.
3. the black king should be in one of the center squares (doesn't matter which), as that allows the greatest scope for mating
4. the black king should not have anywhere to move, to allow maximum mates. note this would be stalemate in a real game, but there's no stipulation it has to be a realistic position.
5. Queens and knights are the only pieces worthy of being considered for white, as they can emulate the moves of every other piece, whereas the reverse is not true.

From the above, I devised a kind of modified greedy algorithm (manual as i cant be bothered to code it), as follows:

1. assign a number B to each square which is not yet taken, where B represents the number of mating moves which either end on that square or pass through that square. Thus B represents the number of mates which would be subtracted if you put a piece on that square. Initially all squares are 0.

2. For each square which is not on a checking line, work out A-B=X, where A is the maximum number of mates you could add by adding a piece. Thus X is the 'net profit' from adding a piece. (queen or knight, although I soon worked out that only queens are really effective - knights cost more than they contribute in the long run).

3. add a piece to whatever square has the most profit. in the event of a tie, favour corner squares first, side squares second and other squares third, since corner/side squares will interfere less with the greedy algo going forward.
4. repeat from 1 until there's no more profit to be had.

The 142 solution above is one of the local maxima using this algo. I can't prove it's the global maximum.

• You get the same number of mates from just putting a queen in every non-checking square, as all that really matters is that every checking square has a queen in each direction that isn't in line with the king. (So yes, this is the global maximum, at least unless using the blocking strategy in the other answer can beat it.) Apr 7, 2016 at 18:01
• Ah yes. Now I feel very stupid! Apr 7, 2016 at 18:17
• Please add a king for the mating side and I will present da green check to you. Apr 21, 2016 at 12:45
• Needs more cowbe... ehr, White King.
– SQB
Jun 6, 2016 at 15:52

Without a king the maximum is 143 mates in one, which was achieved in 1947.