9
$\begingroup$

Which symbol is missing? Explain your reasoning.


enter image description here

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ tbqry'f vapbzcyrgrarff gurberz? but there are so many different encodings for it $\endgroup$
    – Sny
    Commented Jan 20 at 10:43
  • $\begingroup$ @SnySmartie No, not relevant to this puzzle $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ havpbqr is my best bet now, the is element is really confusing $\endgroup$
    – Sny
    Commented Jan 20 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ @SnySmartie No sry, not relevant to that either. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20 at 10:53

1 Answer 1

12
$\begingroup$

The missing symbol is:

the number 1.

If we look at the letters in the corners of the squares...

...these form an anagram of GEOMETRIC. If we order the squares so as to spell this out (disambiguating the two Es by judging what makes the most sense), we see the following:

Equation formed by rearranging letters

In other words:

$(\frac{1}{2})^n, n ∈ N$

This is the summand of a famous geometric series related to Zeno's paradoxes.

The terms of this series are $\frac{1}{2}$, $\frac{1}{4}$, $\frac{1}{8}$, $\frac{1}{16}$, and so on, with the more terms you add taking the total sum a little bit closer towards 1, so that over time we would say that this infinite series 'converges towards 1'. Convergence is represented by an arrow in mathematics, so in the diagram here we are being asked what this infinite geometric series will converge to - and that answer is our missing symbol: 1.

This can be seen and understood a little more clearly through the use of a diagram. Here, adding rectangles with areas equivalent to the terms in this series means that the more terms in the sequence, and the more rectangles you add, the closer you get to a complete unit square of area 1:

The series demonstrated in a diagram
Source: Wikipedia (link above)

As for the title:

While you might suggest that Zeno is the "someone" referred to in the title, since his paradoxes - like 'Achilles and the tortoise' - play on this mechanism, the OP points out in comments that it's actually a pun: someone just sounds like sum one!

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Well done this is correct! The "someone" was just a little word play of fhz bar... zrnavat fhz vf 1. So not related to a person. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 20 at 10:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @Prim3numbah Ahahaha - how did I not spot that?! Nice touch :) $\endgroup$
    – Stiv
    Commented Jan 20 at 11:01

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.