# Kingly Laziness

What is the minimum effort the White king must put into arriving at this destination? His Majesty is not feeling productive today.

This position was composed by Gianni Donati and published in Phénix 2014.

• Ah, I just realized after a bit that we are to find fewest move from initial position to this diagram. At first I thought we start at this diagram and go to the destination, lol. Apr 22 at 10:01
• @justhalf To be clear, the minimum number of White king moves that is needed. Apr 22 at 23:10

Proof game:

1. h4 a5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Nd4 Nd5 4. Nb3 Nc3 5. a3 Nxd1 6. Ra2 Ne3 7. Rh3 Nf5
8. Re3 a4 9. Re6 Ng3 10. Rb6 Nh1 11. Re6 axb3 12. Rd6 bxa2 13. Re6 axb1=B
14. Rd6 Ba2 15. Rc6 Bd5 16. Rd6 Be4 17. Rf6 Bg6 18. Re6 fxe6 19. h5 Bf7 20. h6 g6
21. Kd1 Bg7 22. Ke1 Be5 23. Kd1 Bh2 24. g3 Bg1 25. Bg2 Rf8 26. Bd5 Bg8 27. Ba2 Kf7
28. b3 Kf6 29. Bb2+ Kg5 30. Bd4 Ra5 31. Ba7 b6 32. Ke1 Rff5 33. Kf1 Kh5 34. Kg2 Qf8
35. Kh3 Qg7 36. hxg7 Bf7 37. g8=Q Rg5 38. Qh8 Raf5 39. Qd4 Bb7 40. Qe4 Bd5
41. Qg2 Bf3 42. Qh2 Bg4+ 43. Kg2+ Bh3+ 44. Qxh3#


The reason this is easy to miss is that one is tricked into being so obsessed with promoted Bishops that it doesn't occur to one that the Queen can be replaced, as well.

I count 8 plies with the white King.

Replayer

• I haven't checked your answer (provide PGN maybe?), but will be glad to see the analysis! Apr 23 at 8:42
• Ah, so many things happening here, very clever puzzle. I thought of white queen being promoted, but didn't think that black queen will be the sacrifice for that so couldn't find this line. Apr 23 at 8:49
• Hm, @justhalf, considering the queen is the only proper black piece missing this is a peculiar thing to say ;-) Apr 23 at 8:59
• Uh, well, fair point I guess, haha. I was stuck in the thought that black queen was the sacrifice for the last move. Ugh, having wrong assumption in the beginning is so disruptive, haha Apr 23 at 9:05
• Nice work. The title is just as lazy as the king, if you didn't notice. Apr 23 at 11:13

Black king is in check, so last move was white. White queen has only h2 to retract to, capturing something in h3 in its last move. Black is only missing one pawn and one queen. It can't be pawn since black's f and g pawns are accounted for at e6 and g6, and black's a and b pawns can't reach h3. So it must have been black queen at h3 with a check.

Black pawn at e6 must have come from f7 via capture, so black pawn at g6 must have come from g7. If black pawn at b6 had come from a7 via capture, Ba7 couldn't have moved there normally, unless it was a promoted bishop at b8. But white only has one missing pawn, from column h, and there is not enough missing black pieces for white pawn to promote at b8. So black b6 came from b7, and black a-pawn is missing.

Assuming all the bishops didn't come from promotion, we notice a loop of causality:

1. Ba7 must have moved there before b6
2. b3 must have moved there before white dark square bishop can go to a7
3. Ba2 must have moved there before b3
4. g3 must have moved there before white light square bishop can go to a2
5. Bg1 must have moved there before g3
6. g6 must have moved there before black dark square bishop can go to g1
7. Bf7 must have moved there before g6
8. b6 must have moved there before black light square bishop can go to f7

Therefore our assumption was wrong, so at least one of those bishops were promoted.

• We have seen that Ba7 couldn't have been a promoted piece.
• If Ba2 were a promoted piece, white h-pawn must have promoted at g8, but since there is only one black piece missing, g6 must have moved there before white promoted into light squared bishop, and it couldn't go out from g8. So Ba2 is not a promoted piece.
• If Bg1 were a promoted piece, it must have been a promoted a-pawn at a1 or c1. But then to go to g1 it still needs b3 to have moved there before, so the loop above would still happen (b3 before Bg1, Bg1 before g3, g3 before Ba2, Ba2 before b3). So Bg1 is not a promoted piece.

Therefore Bf7 is a promoted piece (from black a-pawn), and it must have promoted at b1 with 3 captures (capture to move to column b, then b3 to a2 to pass white a-pawn, then a2 to b1). Since white rook can't move in and out of a1-a2-b1 area, the white pieces captured at a2 and b1 must be rook and knight respectively. The white piece captured by black a-pawn to go to b column can be the knight or the rook, and the piece captured by black f-pawn at e6 must be the other one, since white h-pawn can't go to e column.

But now I'm stuck. After black promotes the bishop at a2 and bring it to g6 in preparation to go to f7 (or e8), black must capture white's last free piece at e6, shown in this diagram:

(in the image above, I have made white capture black light squared bishop at c8 with a knight, since it should be captured at some point, and all the pawns are stuck so it could not move anywhere. This frees the queen and king to move to the respective places)

But now white's free piece is only the h-pawn, which only has 2 moves left. But we need at least 6 black moves to free another of white piece (unlocking white g2 by placing black bishop at h2 via: fxe6 Bf7 g6 Bg7 Be5 Bh2). So I must have gone wrong somewhere (unattributed cases, I suppose), but couldn't see it for now.

• You are making one wrong assumption, one that unlocks the rest of the position up from your current standing. Apr 22 at 23:32
• Doesn't White have unlimited tempi with the rook? Apr 23 at 7:43
• @RosieF according to my (flawed) current answer, the rook needs to be taken by black pawn, afterwards no more free moves. Apr 23 at 7:51