The following code, of my own making, follows a well-known, standard procedure. However, it may be interesting to note that there is something unique about it. Try and break it---it will probably be easy, but the theory of what happens is pretty neat. Follow the instructions you find on the way. The answer will be a generic group of three words. (Disregard all that comes before this colon in your attempts to solve this puzzle.):

"12 32 18 8 14 68 69 27 52 43 5 17 3 40 75 7 79"

"Mind turned to puzzles, labyrinthine gambits, reacquisition, tempi, Chess. He moved unbeknownst, warriors hypervigilant, forming an epic, enigmatically, a story. His game was a code, an abstract, a cryptic pattern. A seer only could decode his attacks; they are solveproof. To see transliterated, to speak strange words might puzzle, but alas, straightish in truth was the way to find answers. As the puzzle seems all too much eschew; literati overthink. Do not, his last envoi, is what he said. He addresses those who search, that this, what you now hold, is the book for the code. Later (much later), he says, when one is delving for the third, begin with “The Unanimous”. Lastly, the wizard states, think not too deeply of this riddle---the words' meaning are unimportant, this passage is your key."

For help solving, try searching for the book cipher dcode.fr/en tool.

  • $\begingroup$ Hello! This is the OP. I am very new here. As such, it may be wise not to spend too much time on this question, because I may have faults in it. However, it is to the best of my knowledge complete. Let me know if you need hints, help, or if it's just too hard (because of my presentation, etc). Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Feb 28, 2023 at 22:43
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Please don't post the answer to your own question immediately as the point of this SE (at least to my knowledge) is for others to solve the puzzles you post. $\endgroup$
    – Joe Kerr
    Commented Feb 28, 2023 at 23:00

1 Answer 1


This is a book cipher. What is special is that depending on the key you use, you will get different messages. It was a pain to create, but the theory could be expanded to fit some really cool themes. Right now, with only a short message encrypted, it is like a prototype of the true idea.

First use the given passage (Mind turned to...key.) as your book in a standard book cipher, using the first letter of whatever numbered word, for each number you are decoding. That gives you the message:


Then, if you do the same thing, using the same passage as your key, but with the last letters of each word instead of the first, you get:


If you can work out the tricky spacing, you are prompted to decode this cipher again using the Declaration of Independence, a classic for book ciphers. As the passage states, if you start with "The Unanimous" as your first two words of the Declaration, using the first letters of each word gets you:


You are done. The "PTUT" is just the leftover characters from the previous message. Isn't that neat?

  • $\begingroup$ I think most people will be able to read the text you composed as "key material" and notice that the choice of words is very unusual. Some will read it and think "This looks like an acrostic", noticing that the first letters of the words don't fit the usual distribution of first letters. Normally, the letter E is less common and multi-point scrabble tiles like BWFC are more common at the beginnings of words. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 12:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's still a fascinating idea. It reminds me of those adventure games where the player can turn around after passing through an open doorway, and then close the door to reveal a hidden passage behind it. I'm sure someone can find a use for it in designing those long, multi-stage "puzzle hunts". $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 13:08
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, exactly. What I want to see is one that uses multiple, preset documents, instead of making your own key. Imagine one that would use the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Magna Carta to get three unique messages. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2023 at 13:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.