The first two figures are complete. The third figure is almost complete. What shape is missing in the third figure? Explain why.
Hint 1
------ stands for a word
Hint 2
Something to do with the words themselves...
Hint 3 (strong)
The first two figures are complete. The third figure is almost complete. What shape is missing in the third figure? Explain why.
Hint 1
------ stands for a word
Hint 2
Something to do with the words themselves...
Hint 3 (strong)
New theory: The missing shape is a
LINE!
Reasoning:
We need to fill in the blanks with a single word that makes sense.
It was pretty clear right away that the word was probably 'ocular' but kudos to @prem for getting 2357 to admit it and save us time considering other options.
This gives: NONOCULAR, MONOCULAR, BINOCULAR - which account for the number of circles, or "eyes".
The more difficult task was to answer the actual question - what is the missing shape?
Searching the puzzle for clues, all I found to work with were the words 'ocular' , 'geometric', and 'Matrix'.
After a few failed attempts in other directions, I started trying to count the
number of holes in capital letters (or 'eyes') for quite a while on various sequences but had no luck.
But the new hint seemed to confirm this was a possible approach (seems to show
old letters with holes).
In fact, if we use case shown in the puzzle (not changing to capitals), we get:
Nonocular - 6 letters with NO holes (no eyes): Nnculr
Monocular - 3 letters with 1 hole (one eye): ooa
Binocular - 1 letter with 2 holes (two eyes): B
So the answer might be:
My best guess on the whole:
The 6 letter word is Ocular , giving NonOcular (0) MonOcular (1) BinOcular (2)
the image must have some arc to connect the 2 pieces like this:
Maybe some more clues will help in concluding this
The answer could be
An octagon
Because
The number 6 (amount of edges on a hexagon) itself has no lines of symmetry, the number 3 has one, and the number 8 has two.
The answer could be
A Triskaidecagon (13-sided polygon) (aka Tridecagon)
Because
The word contains two i's (eyes). Also the other spelling cannot work.
I think that the answer should be
Nothing or a circle should be added to the last diagram.
Because
Non means zero,
Mon is short for mono, which is a prefix for one,
Bin is short for binary, which is related to two.
This may be related to the amount of circles, and for every circle in the diagram, three sides are reduced from the shape around them. Then, the shape outside the inner circles should be a shape with zero (straight?) edges, and so there should be nothing added or a larger circle.
I believe the third square can be completed with:
Because:
The empty dashes in each word represent 'ocular' (something I had concluded for myself independently of other posts here), giving us the words 'NONOCULAR' (meaning "no eyes"), 'MONOCULAR' ("one eye"), and 'BINOCULAR' ("two eyes").
The equivalent number of 'eyes' is represented in the centre of each square by the number of circles. So far, nothing new compared to other answers...
However, (and here is the new insight) consider a homophone of 'number of eyes', namely 'number of I's, and look at the spelling of the names of the shapes surrounding the circles:
HEXAGON - no I's;
TRIANGLE - one I.
and next in the sequence should come a simple shape with two I's in its name, meaning one possible answer is a SEMI-CIRCLE!
The reason this sequence is so short as presented is that it gets quite hard after this to continue it without resorting to increasingly obscure shapes. For instance, the first one-word shape you could use in a fourth box would be:
a 21-sided ICOSIKAIHENAGON! (Unless you dropped the one-word requirement and counted an ISOSCELES RIGHT TRIANGLE, of course!)
The pictures are the output of a discrete, recursive function:
$$f : \{1,2,3\} \mapsto \{p_1, p_2 ,p_3\}$$ $$f(1) = 6\text{-sided polytope, 0 circles}$$ $$f(x>1) = \frac{f(x-1)}{x}\text{-sided polytope,} \ x-1 \ \text{circles}$$
For every output, the prefix corresponds to the number of circles.
Thus,
$$f(3) = \frac{f(1)}{2\times3}\text{-sided polytope,} \ 2 \ \text{circles} = \frac{6}{6}\text{-sided polytope,} \ 2 \ \text{circles} = \text{1 line and 2 circles} $$
So, a line is missing.
If location is a variable, the line would cross through the centres of the circles, such that its midpoint hits the point of tangency between the circles. I reckon this, given that the circles seem to be placed in the other shapes' centers.
I had to write polytope, and not polygon, given that $f(x<3)$ yields two-dimensional shapes, whereas $f(3)$ yields a one-dimensional shape.