4
$\begingroup$

I was doing crossword from NY Times, from Mon, Feb 11, 2019 by Howard Barkin + Will Shortz and I got the following clue.

Went after

The answer is "HADAT". However, I can not find definition for HADAT that fits the clue. Various links (ex. reference) shows me this is a common word used in crosswords.

Why is the answer "HADAT and how does the clue "went after" fit?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
11
$\begingroup$

I think the answer is actually 'Had at' - as in 'had a go at (attack) (someone)', which would mean you 'went after' them.

The word 'hadat' itself isn't a word, but putting 'had' and 'at' together will give you the answer.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ mmhm. For reasons like this very example, I enjoy the nytimes crosswords. $\endgroup$
    – Stian
    Jan 20, 2021 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Did the clue say (5) or (3,2) ? These indicate that it's a five letter word, or a three+two letter words $\endgroup$
    – CSM
    Jan 20, 2021 at 13:25
  • $\begingroup$ @CSM the OP doesn’t say, but I presume from knowing this is the intended answer it would have been 3,2 $\endgroup$
    – Beastly Gerbil
    Jan 20, 2021 at 13:29
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @CSM: NYT crosswords (and American crosswords more generally) don't provide word lengths in the clues. $\endgroup$
    – Michael Seifert
    Jan 20, 2021 at 15:46
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ UK crosswords generally do provide the lengths; I thought this was standard international practice. It seems I was mistaken in my assumptions. $\endgroup$
    – CSM
    Jan 20, 2021 at 16:01
9
$\begingroup$

The accepted answer explains this in terms of a four word expression, but that's not really necessary:

From the American Heritage Dictionary
have at

Attack; also, make an attempt at. For example, Urging the dog on, he said, “Go on, Rover, have at him,” or It's time to have at straightening out these files.

This is commonly used in the exhortation "have at it" which is another way of saying "go for it"

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ I think 'have at' is just a shortened version of 'have a go at' but yes this is the same idea $\endgroup$
    – Beastly Gerbil
    Jan 20, 2021 at 14:46
  • $\begingroup$ @BeastlyGerbil "Have at" is definition 27b for "have (v.)" in the OED, with citations dating back to 1400. "Have a go at" might be a more modern variation of it. $\endgroup$
    – chepner
    Jan 20, 2021 at 15:07
  • $\begingroup$ Scrolled down to find this comment; this should be top IMO. "Have at it" is much closer than "Have a go at it" in terms of what the clue's looking for $\endgroup$
    – Joe
    Jan 20, 2021 at 16:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @BeastlyGerbil "have at" significantly predates "have a go at" $\endgroup$
    – Kevin
    Jan 20, 2021 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.