Timeline for Musings at a chess tournament
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2017 at 0:11 | comment | added | willy ontoria | The maths seems right but this is assuming ALL of the players are PATZERS, this is not the case in most tournaments, where is a rarity to find nonsensical games. I know it is to be a bit pedantic on my part | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 7:36 | vote | accept | Gamow | ||
| Mar 3, 2015 at 12:29 | comment | added | Callidus | @mdc32 You are correct - I had the sense of x reversed. I've edited it. | |
| Mar 3, 2015 at 12:28 | history | edited | Callidus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added a more rigorous treatment of part 1.
|
| Mar 3, 2015 at 3:56 | comment | added | mdc32 | Shouldn't $x$ be 50 then? i.e. At least 50 percent of the games in any given tournament are sensical, and there are tournaments where at most 51 percent are sensical. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 13:16 | history | answered | Callidus | CC BY-SA 3.0 |