Timeline for Older twin's birthday is one day after younger's
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
32 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2017 at 13:06 | answer | added | mkinson | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 6, 2017 at 11:26 | history | edited | Rand al'Thor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 81 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 11, 2016 at 20:13 | answer | added | Xavon_Wrentaile | timeline score: 0 | |
| Sep 1, 2015 at 1:55 | history | edited | A E |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 10, 2015 at 14:30 | comment | added | Quinn Culver | I don't think this is a logic puzzle. | |
| Mar 10, 2015 at 4:43 | comment | added | Quinn Culver | It could be that they were both born on the 15th (or 16th) and fought for birthday attention so decided (for various possible reasons) to celebrate that way. (I'm exploiting the fact that you only specified when each "celebrates".) | |
| Feb 15, 2015 at 14:49 | answer | added | Kate Gregory | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 15, 2015 at 1:05 | answer | added | Inquisitive | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:34 | answer | added | Richard | timeline score: 13 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 13:17 | comment | added | michael | The question is protected, so I can't answer, and will instead comment here (spoiler): the younger brother lives in (for example) China, and the older brother Iives in (for example) the U.S.; thus, without any oddity surrounding their birth, the younger brother celebrates their birthday a day early (a simpler use of timezones than any proposals thus far). | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 1:55 | history | edited | pacoverflow | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Can't believe 3 people screwed up the title!
|
| S Feb 14, 2015 at 1:23 | history | suggested | blahdiblah | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Change title to not be completely generic
|
| Feb 13, 2015 at 21:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 14, 2015 at 1:23 | |||||
| Feb 13, 2015 at 10:36 | history | protected | user20 | ||
| Feb 13, 2015 at 8:08 | answer | added | astreal | timeline score: 5 | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 8:01 | answer | added | Bert | timeline score: 8 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 21:39 | answer | added | bmonger | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 21:29 | answer | added | Florian F | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 20:07 | answer | added | Booleanz | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 18:19 | answer | added | Josh | timeline score: 14 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 17:00 | comment | added | Shokhet | @Meelo I thought the same thing, at first; on a closer read it's clear that the older brother has the later birthday. | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:18 | answer | added | stevenjackson121 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 14:23 | answer | added | Shivan Dragon | timeline score: 7 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 12:12 | history | edited | BmyGuest |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 12, 2015 at 12:07 | answer | added | AndyT | timeline score: 6 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 9:13 | answer | added | Just J for now | timeline score: 23 | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 5:24 | comment | added | Johnny | @Meelo - since Foo is 5 minutes older than Bar, Foo would have had to have been born 5 minutes before Bar. | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 4:15 | comment | added | Milo Brandt | Why isn't "Foo was born at 12:03 AM and Bar was born at 11:58 PM" a solution? Is there a typo? | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:49 | history | edited | Rand al'Thor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:44 | answer | added | pacoverflow | timeline score: 46 | |
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:37 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:49 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2015 at 23:36 | history | asked | Vallabh Patade | CC BY-SA 3.0 |