Timeline for Something is wrong with the equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2018 at 10:58 | history | edited | JMP | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
english and grammar
|
| Sep 6, 2018 at 9:52 | comment | added | Oray | @lovemathboy I gave my solution here since no other good solution exists here and accepted it. I think it was kinda hard :( | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 9:51 | vote | accept | Oray | ||
| Sep 6, 2018 at 9:51 | history | edited | Oray | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 395 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2018 at 9:26 | comment | added | Luis Sousa | you can only swap each square once for the optimal clear solution @lovemathboy | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 8:54 | comment | added | lovemathboy | Hopefully the new solution I found was your intended answer @Oray :) | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 8:51 | history | edited | lovemathboy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 469 characters in body
|
| Sep 6, 2018 at 8:06 | comment | added | nickgard | According to a comment on the OP, evaluation should be left to right, which would give $27-3\times9=216$. FWIW, I'd prefer usual operator precedence in any arithmetic puzzle. | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 5:21 | comment | added | Oray | @Quintec originally i was not planning to accept 0( concept then i thought it would be okay :) | |
| Sep 6, 2018 at 2:02 | comment | added | Quintec | @Oray what do you mean by "no trick"? this answer fits all the rules, does it not? | |
| Sep 5, 2018 at 21:15 | comment | added | Oray | this is good one, but not my intended answer and 4 is actually optimal though actual answer does not require any trick. | |
| Sep 5, 2018 at 16:33 | history | answered | lovemathboy | CC BY-SA 4.0 |