Skip to main content
added 622 characters in body
Source Link
Lopsy
  • 8k
  • 31
  • 54

I believe the minimum is about $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$$5.88$, whichand is about 6.12261393519866achieved by a Mylar balloon shape.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. The only condition says that the paper can't get bigger. That is, if you imagine the paper as a fully stretched sheet of rubber, then the rubber can't stretch any more, it can only shrink. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, we have a hard math problem on our hands, from the calculus of variations. The Mylar balloon solves this problem (thanks Florian F), and looks like this (diagram from Wikipedia):

enter image description here

(To get the Mylar balloon, rotate this image around the vertical axis.)

To create your very own Mylar balloon, get a circle of paper of circumferenceradius $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$$a+\epsilon$, and pleatwhere $a$ is the arc length from the diagram. Pleat it into an approximation of a hemispherethe top half of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$the Mylar balloon. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almostsquashed-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemispherebottom half, and stitch along the boundary. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphereMylar balloon of volume 1.

Using the formulas in the Wikipedia page, we find that for a Mylar balloon of volume 1, each of the papers is a circle of radius $a \approx 0.936$. Therefore, the length of stitching required is $2\pi a\approx 5.88$.

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. The only condition says that the paper can't get bigger. That is, if you imagine the paper as a fully stretched sheet of rubber, then the rubber can't stretch any more, it can only shrink. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

I believe the minimum is about $5.88$, and is achieved by a Mylar balloon shape.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. The only condition says that the paper can't get bigger. That is, if you imagine the paper as a fully stretched sheet of rubber, then the rubber can't stretch any more, it can only shrink. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, we have a hard math problem on our hands, from the calculus of variations. The Mylar balloon solves this problem (thanks Florian F), and looks like this (diagram from Wikipedia):

enter image description here

(To get the Mylar balloon, rotate this image around the vertical axis.)

To create your very own Mylar balloon, get a circle of paper of radius $a+\epsilon$, where $a$ is the arc length from the diagram. Pleat it into an approximation of the top half of the Mylar balloon. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining squashed-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the bottom half, and stitch along the boundary. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) Mylar balloon of volume 1.

Using the formulas in the Wikipedia page, we find that for a Mylar balloon of volume 1, each of the papers is a circle of radius $a \approx 0.936$. Therefore, the length of stitching required is $2\pi a\approx 5.88$.

added 189 characters in body
Source Link
Lopsy
  • 8k
  • 31
  • 54

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. The only condition says that the paper can't get bigger. That is, if you imagine the paper as a fully stretched sheet of rubber, then the rubber can't stretch any more, it can only shrink. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. The only condition says that the paper can't get bigger. That is, if you imagine the paper as a fully stretched sheet of rubber, then the rubber can't stretch any more, it can only shrink. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

added 44 characters in body
Source Link
Lopsy
  • 8k
  • 31
  • 54

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

I believe the minimum is $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, which is about 6.12261393519866.

Let me introduce you to the magic of paper pleating:

enter image description here

The Nash-Kuiper embedding theorem $-$ well, a specific case of it, translated into English $-$ says that we can pleat paper into any shape, wasting as little paper as we want to. I recommend image searching "pleated paper"; it looks cool.

With that in mind, get a circle of paper of circumference $\frac 12\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{5/3}+\epsilon$, and pleat it into an approximation of a hemisphere of circumference $\sqrt[3]{6}\pi^{2/3}+\epsilon$. Slice off a plane very close to the equator, so that the boundary of the remaining almost-hemisphere of paper lies on a plane. Reflect to get the other hemisphere. Voila, a (very good approximation of a) sphere of volume 1.

Source Link
Lopsy
  • 8k
  • 31
  • 54
Loading