Timeline for Bar fight prevention
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2018 at 22:57 | vote | accept | padawan | ||
| Jan 24, 2018 at 12:24 | comment | added | Nautilus | 1 and 8 seem to contradict each other. | |
| Jan 23, 2018 at 8:24 | comment | added | Xenocacia | Charlie sounds like a real piece of work. | |
| Jan 19, 2018 at 0:03 | answer | added | Asteria | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 17:13 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | @F1Krazy It doesn't really matter, since if you have both C and D you can't have anyone else. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 17:07 | answer | added | Untitpoi | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 17:06 | comment | added | ngn | @padawan No names beginning with I and K? | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:53 | history | edited | padawan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:53 | comment | added | padawan | @Bachrach44 "other will not take it" meaning that "stand there and take it." fixed. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:53 | comment | added | Untitpoi | I guess Charlie and Daniel would fight to death if they cross in that bar. it is better to separate them to my humble view. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:51 | comment | added | PopularIsn'tRight | Clarification needed on this sentence: "The conflicts are mutual. If one wants to fight another, then you cannot assume the other will take it." So are the conflicts bi-directional or not? It seems to say both. | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:36 | comment | added | F1Krazy | I take it Charlie and Daniel would not fight each other despite being nemeses? | |
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:30 | history | edited | padawan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 18, 2018 at 16:24 | history | asked | padawan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |