Timeline for What's the best way to ensure a cryptogram has a unique solution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:35 | answer | added | Set Big O | timeline score: 7 | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:22 | history | edited | A E | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
neaten-up title
|
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:16 | history | reopened |
Bozman Warlord 099 A E warspyking Set Big O |
||
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Dec 4, 2014 at 19:16 | |||||
Dec 4, 2014 at 18:42 | history | edited | warspyking | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 72 characters in body; edited title
|
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:44 | comment | added | Ross Millikan | One way, which I suspect is the way the logic puzzle programmers do it, is to write a solving program with whatever logical implications you want. For a specific puzzle, you generate the solution first. You feed the (empty set) of clues to your solver. If it can't solve the puzzle, you add a random clue, then repeat until the solver succeeds. This lets you have different levels of puzzle, as you can limit the ways the solver can derive information. | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 2:07 | history | closed | Doorknob | Needs more focus | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 2:07 | history | reopened | user20 | ||
Dec 4, 2014 at 2:07 | history | closed | user20 | Needs more focus | |
Dec 4, 2014 at 2:02 | history | asked | warspyking | CC BY-SA 3.0 |