Timeline for Is there some comprehensive, overall classification of puzzles?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 20, 2017 at 14:20 | comment | added | zatvornik | Agreed with everybody. Compilation of wikipedia's list + Puzzling tags list + this list is not an ideal solution, but it's still very good solution :) Thanks! | |
Feb 20, 2017 at 14:06 | vote | accept | zatvornik | ||
Feb 19, 2017 at 4:45 | comment | added | user33097 | I don't see a problem with listing any one puzzle twice as an example if it falls under two different categories. | |
Feb 19, 2017 at 2:51 | comment | added | boboquack | Adding to Rand's comment, Rubik's Cube is listed twice | |
Feb 18, 2017 at 21:33 | history | edited | Melkor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 40 characters in body
|
Feb 18, 2017 at 21:33 | comment | added | Melkor | @randal'thor this is the only list I know of, so I have shared it. It's not necessarily the best, and it's certainly not perfection, but I think it's pretty good. | |
Feb 18, 2017 at 19:46 | comment | added | Rand al'Thor | And what makes this classification better than other possibilities? The classification system of Wikipedia articles isn't exactly known for its perfection | |
Feb 18, 2017 at 19:44 | history | answered | Melkor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |