Timeline for How do you prove that mirrors aren't parallel universes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2016 at 0:50 | comment | added | Fabich | @ruakh No the reflected RIta can't be throwing a vampire, there would be a symmetry problem because bouncing against the mirror does not turn you. The boucing back vampire does not change direction and therefore proves that miror are not portals. | |
| Nov 30, 2016 at 13:38 | comment | added | Wossname | This is inspired. Absolutely inspired :) | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 21:14 | comment | added | user64742 | @Zxyrra i love joke answers. | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 20:31 | comment | added | Zxyrra | @TheGreatDuck it's a joke answer, I acknowledge that vampires don't exist | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 19:46 | comment | added | user64742 | @Zxyrra well vampires dont exist, so its a moot point. | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 3:55 | comment | added | Zxyrra | @ruakh In order to only see your own vampires there must be something special about them and / or special about your eyes - they're "tuned" to each other or something - which would make each universe unique. Alternatively it could be a characteristic of the mirrors, although I'm hesitant to add an 11th law just pertaining to vamps | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 3:52 | comment | added | ruakh | @Zxyrra: How does it go against the "We are not unique" law? Each universe is the same; its residents can only see their own vampires. | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 2:03 | comment | added | Zxyrra | @ruakh That is true although the existence of vampires alone justifies Rita's claims because it goes against the "We are not unique" law | |
| Nov 28, 2016 at 1:23 | comment | added | ruakh | If mirrors are portals to other universes, and vampires don't appear in mirrors, then the simplest explanation is that we can only see vampires from our own universe. Rita's counterpart actually is throwing a counterpart vampire into the mirror, but Rita and Joe can't see him, just as their counterparts can't see the vampire that Rita is throwing. (Does that make any less sense than the idea that we can see vampires but not vampire reflections?) | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 18:53 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @Rubio But vampires don't have reflections... So if the vampire gets a headbonk, there is "proof" that the reflection didn't do it, therefore Law 6 can't be all that did it, therefore something's wrong. | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 18:46 | comment | added | Rubio♦ | @wizzwizz4 Depends how hard they hit it. Either Law 6 causes a head bonk, or Law 10 causes one with a potential for getting cut on top of it. | |
| Nov 26, 2016 at 11:50 | comment | added | wizzwizz4 | @Rubio Actually, that would just break the mirror, not cause the object to stop at the mirror. (I think...) | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 20:18 | comment | added | Rubio♦ | Law 10 now clearly precludes this. In either case now a head bonk is forthcoming. -1. 😄 | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 15:30 | history | edited | Zxyrra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2016 at 23:52 | history | edited | Zxyrra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Nov 23, 2016 at 23:30 | comment | added | Rubio♦ | Certainly a common household item. +1? | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 23:29 | comment | added | Joe | I'd be somewhat concerned if many people consider this a common household object. :-) | |
| Nov 23, 2016 at 23:28 | history | answered | Zxyrra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |