Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
Glorfindel
  • 28.2k
  • 9
  • 98
  • 143

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprsdominators will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

I would assume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory. Otherwise the solution is trivially 2000 dominators.

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprs will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

I would assume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory. Otherwise the solution is trivially 2000 dominators.

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominators will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

I would assume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory. Otherwise the solution is trivially 2000 dominators.

Titles describing hard or easy are not needed
Link
Rohcana
  • 4k
  • 22
  • 49

Dominating Furbles (Very Hard)

added 107 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprs will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprs will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how manyI would you expect to dominate?

Assumeassume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory. Otherwise the solution is trivially 2000 dominators.

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprs will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

Assume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory.

This question was previously from the Haselbauer - Dickheiser Test For Exceptional Intelligence, a test that was previously available on the website www.highiqosociety.com, but was removed several years ago.

Consider two breeding strategies of the fictional Furble. Dominator Furbles can fight for a breeding territory, and if they win, will be able to rear 10 offspring. An alternative is to share territory with another Furble which will allow each to rear 5 offspring. Sharers who attempt to share with dominatprs will be forced out of the territory, although they will be able to find a new territory. Assume sharers become extra cautious after encountering a dominator and so will always find another territory to share the next time around, but due to lost time will only be able to produce 3 offspring. Dominators are always able to force sharers out of the territory and rear 10 young. Dominators who meet dominators will win 50% of the time. When they lose, they are not able to reproduce that season due to sustained injuries. Individual Furbles cannot switch strategies.

With a total population of 2000 dominator and sharer Furbles altogether, how many would you expect to dominate?

I would assume no Furble finds an empty location. They either find someone to share or fight for their territory. Otherwise the solution is trivially 2000 dominators.

Notice removed Needs citation by user20
added 98 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
Notice added Needs citation by user20
added 115 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
edited title
Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
deleted 58 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
added 168 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
added 10 characters in body
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading
Source Link
Kenshin
  • 3.4k
  • 21
  • 43
Loading