Timeline for The old man doesn't like seagull meat
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2014 at 4:08 | comment | added | Philipp | @Bachrach44: According to the Death of the author hypothesis, it doesn't matter what the author says because his interpretation isn't more or less valid than that of anyone else. Especially when the author has an unintentional plothole. | |
| Nov 8, 2014 at 23:41 | comment | added | PopularIsn'tRight | @d'alar'cop As I said, the answer to the riddle is posted elsewhere in the answer section here, and has been confirmed by the OP. I made no assumptions whatsoever - I knew. | |
| Nov 8, 2014 at 20:18 | comment | added | Narmer | You deserve the most creative answer badge! | |
| Nov 8, 2014 at 6:19 | comment | added | d'alar'cop | @Bachrach44 "For the purposes of the riddle" - that makes undue assumptions about the intended answer of this particular riddle | |
| Nov 7, 2014 at 20:26 | comment | added | PopularIsn'tRight | The answer is above in a spoiler tag if you're curious. I've heard this one before (although admittedly it was a much shorter version). | |
| Nov 7, 2014 at 20:24 | comment | added | Philipp | @Bachrach44 says who? | |
| Nov 7, 2014 at 20:21 | comment | added | PopularIsn'tRight | For the purposes of the riddle, it's immaterial. Pretend he was told what was on the menu by a fellow passenger or the cook. | |
| Nov 7, 2014 at 19:50 | history | edited | Philipp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 116 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2014 at 19:17 | history | answered | Philipp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |