Timeline for English is so confusing! Can one word have two opposite meanings?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2016 at 20:11 | comment | added | Sean_J | @Strawberry yes I was referring to what Lego said | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 13:03 | comment | added | user21939 | Webster's dictionary now accepts "literally" meaning not literally? Argh! It's true! | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 2:59 | comment | added | user10676 | @Strawberry You are literally wrong - english.stackexchange.com/a/154580/53089 | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 2:32 | comment | added | DJohnM | The double use of "literally" is sanctioned by Merriam-Webster. among others... | |
| Jun 13, 2016 at 1:26 | comment | added | SirPython | @Strawberry It's wrong, but many people use it that way. | |
| Jun 12, 2016 at 8:28 | comment | added | Strawberry | The second use is literally wrong. | |
| Jun 12, 2016 at 0:44 | review | First posts | |||
| Jun 12, 2016 at 2:50 | |||||
| Jun 12, 2016 at 0:43 | history | answered | Sean_J | CC BY-SA 3.0 |