Timeline for The Fathers' Riddle
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:22 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 12:05 | vote | accept | dcfyj | ||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 9:18 | answer | added | Brent Hackers | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 2, 2016 at 0:55 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Jun 2, 2016 at 0:09 | answer | added | Tony Ruth | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 21:20 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 71 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 21:08 | comment | added | Luis Masuelli | Please be more specific. Living beings & Cells is still a valid answer even for the clarification you added. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 21:02 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 216 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 20:54 | comment | added | Luis Masuelli | Cells? I made an answer with that. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 20:54 | answer | added | Luis Masuelli | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 19:44 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 99 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 17:23 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 115 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 17:01 | comment | added | dcfyj | @Roland Yes, each "few" refers to individual subsets of the fathers but they may or may not have overlap. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 16:51 | comment | added | Roland | Plenty of physical answers to the first several lines, but they don't agree with the last few. To clarify, each "few" refers to a subset of the fathers? Or does the use of "a few others" change the next to third person? | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:59 | answer | added | user14352 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:58 | comment | added | dcfyj | @BeastlyGerbil it's how I roll, I hate spoiling things. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:57 | comment | added | Beastly Gerbil | oooh cryptic :) | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:48 | comment | added | dcfyj | @BeastlyGerbil yes and no. Their children are most certainly physical and as are the fathers but at the same time, the fathers can be considered abstract in their grouping. | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | Beastly Gerbil | Im assuming the answer is something abstract, not a physical thing | |
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:36 | history | edited | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| Jun 1, 2016 at 15:21 | history | asked | dcfyj | CC BY-SA 3.0 |