Return to Answer

Lengthened the sequence to show that it repeats itself.

Source Link

edit approved Feb 5, 2015 at 21:33

Another valid answer:

Using similar rules as the accept answer. The first number specified the quantity of digits of the entire set above it and the second number specifies what the digit is. The accepted answer is a reading of the prior sequence, this answer is a summary of the prior sequence.

Fun fact, coming back to this. This sequence will hit a point where it will output the same number forever.

Another valid answer:

Using similar rules as the accept answer. The first number specified the quantity of digits of the entire set above it and the second number specifies what the digit is. The accepted answer is a reading of the prior sequence, this answer is a summary of the prior sequence.

Another valid answer:

Using similar rules as the accept answer. The first number specified the quantity of digits of the entire set above it and the second number specifies what the digit is. The accepted answer is a reading of the prior sequence, this answer is a summary of the prior sequence.

Fun fact, coming back to this. This sequence will hit a point where it will output the same number forever.

Source Link

created Sep 17, 2014 at 18:09

drovani

Another valid answer:

Using similar rules as the accept answer. The first number specified the quantity of digits of the entire set above it and the second number specifies what the digit is. The accepted answer is a reading of the prior sequence, this answer is a summary of the prior sequence.