Timeline for Connect 3 houses with 3 wells
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2015 at 14:48 | comment | added | Voitcus | However, I like the torus solution and +1'd it | |
| Jul 3, 2015 at 19:26 | comment | added | MartynA | @Voitcus: It's funny how times change. When I went to school (1960s) a solution involving pipes over/below was regarded as "cheating", since the purpose of the problem was to demonstrate what isn't possible on a flat plane but is possible on a torus. Topology 101, I suppose. I vaguely recall there might have been a SciAm article about it. | |
| Jul 3, 2015 at 16:04 | history | edited | Hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Improved answer
|
| Jul 3, 2015 at 11:02 | comment | added | Shivam Pandya | Its line a "particle accelerator". :D Be careful. :). BTW. very nice answer | |
| Jul 3, 2015 at 10:09 | comment | added | Konrad Viltersten | For the awesomely nice picture (which I understand you designed and drew yourself just to make the answer be nice, right?) I think you deserve +1. | |
| Jul 2, 2015 at 5:36 | comment | added | Voitcus | If one uses 3D it's not necessary to use a torus, because any intersection can be avoided by placing a pipe over/below another one (digging it in deeper) | |
| Jul 1, 2015 at 14:48 | history | edited | Hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 16 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2015 at 14:30 | history | edited | Hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Jul 1, 2015 at 14:19 | history | answered | Hunter | CC BY-SA 3.0 |