Timeline for Treasure hunt 'round the world! (prologue)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2018 at 11:33 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Apr 11, 2018 at 12:26 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:50 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://puzzling.stackexchange.com/ with https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 24, 2015 at 1:13 | history | edited | Bob | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added link the next puzzle
|
| Jun 18, 2015 at 15:53 | comment | added | Bailey M | @LeppyR64 the mess of answers is probably the biggest reason, actually. With 4 answers on this prologue alone, I didn't feel it was wise for all the other answers to the larger parts to be attached to this question as well. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 15:49 | comment | added | LeppyR64 | As much as I would like to see the whole puzzle under one heading, it's difficult to give respect to those that make the early steps. It's also tough to keep focus on the puzzle as we don't know if we're waitin for you to do the next step or if the current answers are wrong. There will probably be a whole mess of Partial/incorrect answers because of it too. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 15:48 | comment | added | LeppyR64 | @BaileyM Without seeing the rest of the story, I probably agree with abandoning the tag. | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Bailey M | ||
| Jun 18, 2015 at 14:50 | history | edited | Bailey M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
no longer a semi-interactive puzzle
|
| Jun 18, 2015 at 13:12 | comment | added | Bailey M | I'm considering abandoning the "semi-interactive puzzle" tag and making each part of the Treasure Hunt 'Round the World its own question; I'm torn, because it means that I can't easily tie information from previous steps back in with the current step, but ultimately I think that Eli deserves a "correct answer" stamp for his awesome work on this puzzle. Any opinions from the peanut gallery? | |
| Jun 18, 2015 at 1:25 | answer | added | Eli | timeline score: 31 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 20:56 | answer | added | Ninety-Three | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 20:46 | answer | added | Jared | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 20:23 | answer | added | BethM | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 19:50 | history | edited | Bailey M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Jun 17, 2015 at 18:54 | comment | added | PrincessTrevor | Well just to save someone the trouble, the number there isn't prime. Its two factors (971 and 312169134763), however, are. | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 18:18 | comment | added | Mark N | "How many months have you been waiting for this day?" - Too many.. | |
| Jun 17, 2015 at 18:13 | history | asked | Bailey M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |