Timeline for How do I constrain a puzzle and keep a singular solution?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14 at 13:59 | comment | added | Dmitry Kamenetsky | And now it exists: puzzling.stackexchange.com/questions/125934/… | |
| Mar 10 at 4:38 | vote | accept | Brandan | ||
| Mar 10 at 4:38 | comment | added | Brandan | I suspect that would be impossible to meaningfully constrain. The +/- might be the sweet spot. | |
| Mar 9 at 3:31 | comment | added | Dmitry Kamenetsky | What happens when you replace A and B with just a single character X? So you need to join X to X. Does that still have a unique solution? An interesting puzzle in itself is to find one arrangement of X that DOES have a unique solution. | |
| Mar 8 at 6:08 | comment | added | Brandan | This is really good. Like a combination of some magnet/domino puzzles I've played and other "strip" grid deduction. | |
| Mar 8 at 1:13 | history | answered | Bubbler | CC BY-SA 4.0 |