Skip to main content
added 84 characters in body
Source Link

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

(This question arose during a discussion with participants in the Soacha (Colombia) 2023 Math Circle.)

499 and the Gamma Function

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

(This question arose during a discussion with participants in the Soacha (Colombia) 2023 Math Circle.)

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

(This question arose during a discussion with participants in the Soacha (Colombia) 2023 Math Circle.)

499 and the Gamma Function

Notice removed Authoritative reference needed by Bernardo Recamán Santos
Bounty Ended with isaacg's answer chosen by Bernardo Recamán Santos
Clarification
Source Link

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

(This question arose during a discussion with participants in the Soacha (Colombia) 2023 Math Circle.)

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

(This question arose during a discussion with participants in the Soacha (Colombia) 2023 Math Circle.)

Notice added Authoritative reference needed by Bernardo Recamán Santos
Bounty Started worth 50 reputation by Bernardo Recamán Santos
Clarification
Source Link

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (eboth with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials, fractional points (e.g. 0.0001111), and square roots?

Which is the smallest natural number that can not be expressed in base 2 with precisely four ones and four zeros using the four basic arithmetic operations, exponentiation, concatenation, brackets, fractions, factorials (including double factorials), fractional points (both with or without leading zeros, e.g. 0.0001111 or .00110011), and square roots?

Became Hot Network Question
added comment clarification
Source Link
bobble
  • 10.6k
  • 4
  • 34
  • 86
Loading
[Edit removed during grace period]
Source Link
Weather Vane
  • 15.3k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 56
Loading
added clarity from comment
Source Link
Weather Vane
  • 15.3k
  • 1
  • 24
  • 56
Loading
added 19 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
deleted 10 characters in body
Source Link
Loading
Error corrected!
Source Link
Loading
Source Link
Loading