Skip to main content
added 179 characters in body
Source Link
SQLnoob
  • 8.6k
  • 30
  • 46

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1

And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

Edited to add:

There is this, which is perhaps a bit prettier:

3

Or this pinwheel I made:

4

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1

And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

Edited to add:

There is this, which is perhaps a bit prettier:

3

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1

And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

Edited to add:

There is this, which is perhaps a bit prettier:

3

Or this pinwheel I made:

4

added 120 characters in body
Source Link
SQLnoob
  • 8.6k
  • 30
  • 46

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1 

And And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

Edited to add:

There is this, which is perhaps a bit prettier:

3

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1 And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1 

And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2

Edited to add:

There is this, which is perhaps a bit prettier:

3

Source Link
SQLnoob
  • 8.6k
  • 30
  • 46

I think this works:

Start with a construction that actually has too many rows (in this case, 20):

1 And then move one of the trees so that it breaks 2 of the rows but preserves the rest. In this case, I moved point A a little further out so it was no longer in line with the two sides of the red square:

2