Timeline for An amorphous connect wall
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2020 at 9:49 | comment | added | Stiv | @msh210 WHAAAAA??! Somebody really needs to invent an emoji for this scenario... | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 9:11 | comment | added | msh210 | @Stiv, the latter. | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 7:38 | comment | added | Stiv | @msh210 This is happening to me a lot this week...! Is the initial observation at all important or just another freak coincidence?! | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 7:37 | comment | added | Stiv | @GarethMcCaughan Thanks - my assumption there was that was to steer us away from trying to form a group of 4 musical note homophones out of RE, ME, SEW and (insert another one here). Never mind though - back to the drawing board! | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 5:57 | comment | added | msh210 | +1. As noted, this doesn't match a couple of the hints — and it's not my intended answer. Perhaps it's time for a stronger hint. | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 2:09 | comment | added | Gareth McCaughan♦ | This is most ingenious. It doesn't seem to explain the observation in hint 1 that RE-ROBE could have been RE instead if RE hadn't been the name of a musical note. | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 1:01 | comment | added | Jeremy Dover | According to QAT, you can put rot13(gryy (gryn) naq yrr (yrn) vagb tebhc 2, zbir frj (fnj) gb tebhc 3, naq zbir xb (xbn) gb tebhc 1). | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 0:41 | comment | added | PDT | If this was the intended answer, I would be disappointed. | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 0:37 | comment | added | Stiv | Just noticed after posting that this doesn't satisfy the third hint, so I must have something in the wrong group, but so much of this fits (including the first two hints) that I feel this must be incredibly close to the bullseye...! :) | |
| Nov 5, 2020 at 0:35 | history | answered | Stiv | CC BY-SA 4.0 |