Timeline for Is $~\let\r\raise\text{3rd.3}\r.6ex{\small3}\r1.1ex{\scriptsize3}\!\:\r1.6ex{\tiny3}\!\;\r2.2ex.\!\r2.5ex.\!\r2.8ex.\!\!\!\!\!\!(~)~$ too much to ask?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Sep 12, 2020 at 17:08 | history | bounty ended | humn | ||
S Sep 12, 2020 at 17:08 | history | notice removed | humn | ||
S Sep 10, 2020 at 21:48 | history | bounty started | humn | ||
S Sep 10, 2020 at 21:48 | history | notice added | humn | Reward existing answer | |
Sep 10, 2020 at 21:48 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
(while setting bounty) smaller diagram
|
Sep 10, 2020 at 7:16 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
mention Paul Panzer's solution and how nicely it lays out on the grid
|
Sep 10, 2020 at 7:04 | vote | accept | humn | ||
Sep 9, 2020 at 19:14 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
add grid of variables
|
Sep 9, 2020 at 3:40 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
clarify that the no-larger-functions restriction applies only to function definitions; emphasize that the 5 mystery functions do not include Min.2() and Max.2()
|
Sep 9, 2020 at 2:25 | answer | added | Paul Panzer | timeline score: 4 | |
Sep 9, 2020 at 1:00 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
(while 2nd on newest and active lists) too self-conscious
|
Sep 8, 2020 at 22:14 | comment | added | humn |
The puzzle statement is now more clear about using only numbers as arguments, @Ben Barden, though we could certainly use some (more? i don't recall any) puzzles with functional parameters. If you have an approach that breaks any of this puzzle's conditions, please post nonetheless! I do have working code that follows these conditions straightforwardly and have added to the statement a link to what motivated this puzzle. Incidentally, some MathJax puzzles' solutions actually create functions (\macros) on the fly.
|
|
Sep 8, 2020 at 21:49 | history | edited | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
move question up to top of puzzle per @Bass's suggestion, mention puzzle's motivation
|
Sep 8, 2020 at 19:46 | comment | added | Ben Barden | Are functions-as-parameters permitted? If not, are you absolutely certain this is solvable? It would be difficult even with them, but it doesn't look solvable to me without them. There's too much complexity to dig through, and not enough resources to do the digging. | |
Sep 8, 2020 at 15:28 | history | asked | humn | CC BY-SA 4.0 |